this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2024
516 points (98.1% liked)

Not The Onion

12272 readers
1984 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] snek@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

But have Democrats not been quitting Biden's admin?

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If they have, then that's to their credit. Sadly, it hasn't been enough.

[–] snek@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think a decent amount of people have quit. It hasn't been enough because the pushback from Biden's administration in ignoring them is pretty stubborn and strong. I think both parties have divided on this but I feel like a larger portion of Democrats, when compared to Republicans, are pro-Palestinian or at least were opposed enough to the bloodshed to quit their posts. The views of these two groups should not be expected to be generalizable at such a critical and decisive time.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm looking not at the personal stand some have taken, but the effects of the party's action in whole.

It's just no different from Republicans. Democrats say they oppose Israeli genocide, but they make sure the money and weapons flow into it, so to me, the words and symbolic actiosn ring hollow.

[–] snek@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah sure but my point is again: you cannot generalize the party as a whole at this time. You can't just call any difference in opinion within the party as a "personal stand". It's not personal, it's a political statement.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah sure but my point is again: you cannot generalize the party as a whole at this time.

After this last primary, I certainly can.

[–] snek@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I seriously think this is a bad way to go about life, generalizing in general. Makes you see things in black and white. I realize this in itself is a generalization but I think you get the point.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

In some ways, yes, but look at this objectively. The people who vote Democrat could have voted for Marianne Williamson, a person is actively against genocide, and also has other positive views like support for a living wage.

Those same voters have watched Joe Biden enable genocide and apartheid, and it was only an embarrassing incident on national TV that finally got them to admit that, maybe, they were wrong, not the genocide.

This generalization is well-earned. I'd feel differently if Williamson had gotten even handful of delegates, but nope.