this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2024
338 points (90.2% liked)

Technology

59157 readers
2528 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 45 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It doesn't even cost that for them.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think they meant what the end user would NORMALLY pay, which is the better comparison.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But Apple isn't buying consumer ram, they're spending $8 to put on a different chip instead. If other laptop manufacturers are charging $50, it's because they think they can get away with it, like apple.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Think that's not really what's being compared, but ok

[–] RogueBanana@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The point is that the scam is actually even worse.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's really not. Other companies with socketed RAM also upsell, they are just limited in how much they can ask because the customer has the option to DIY adding more RAM. So the cost these companies charge is roughly the price to the customer of upgrading their own RAM, plus a bit extra for the convenience of not having to do that.

For example, Framework upcharges by something like 20-50% for RAM and SSDs when comparing to equivalent parts. It's not just Apple, all OEMs do it, but Apple can charge much more because the user can't easily replace either on their own.

[–] RogueBanana@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Since everyone is doing it, we should not call it out and just accept those insane margins...

My point is it's not unique to Apple, so saying "don't buy Apple because they do X" when literally every other computer company does the same thing is a poor argument.

That's really not the fight we should be having, we should be fighting for a right to repair, which would mean we'd at least have a chance at an alternative to their overpriced services. Even if upgrades are complex, if customer and independent repair places have access to parts, someone will find a way to do those upgrades.