this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2024
178 points (96.8% liked)

Not The Onion

11843 readers
156 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

These are not used to kill people...

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you actually "lock people in a closed phone booth sized space until the smoke is gone", you are absolutely taking a significant risk of someone dying. You need airflow to replace oxygen in a space that small.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Given that it's a hospital, I doubt that they'd be using anything that's likely to kill someone.

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Read what he's describing. He's basically saying "fuck smokers, they get what they get". "Fuck smokers" is fine, but if you're deliberately trying to trap them in a tiny, contained room that you're not circulating air through, they will be deprived of oxygen.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You'll have a hard time convincing me that his plan is to kill anyone who smokes in his hospital.

Not only does it go against the whole point of a hospital, it's probably very illegal for him to kill anyone that way, and I wouldn't be surprised if some of his top staff are smokers. Not to mention that there'd have to be multiple people in on it during the installation and usage.

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You can't make them breathe all their smoke in if there's sufficient air circulation.

What he's describing can't not result in decreased access to oxygen.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think you might be taking his words too literally

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What he's advocating is deranged so he must be joking?

He said what he said.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What ~~he's advocating is~~ his literal words are sound deranged so he must be ~~joking~~ speaking figuratively?

Yeah, that's usually how that works.

No, that's not usually how it works. It's never how it works. This isn't satire. It's an actual proposal.

People advocating for unhinged bullshit do so because and only because they believe in it. There is no alternate interpretation of "lock people in a closed space with their smoke to punish them". If there was sufficient airflow the smoke would be gone in seconds.