this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
685 points (98.2% liked)

RetroGaming

19329 readers
366 users here now

Vintage gaming community.

Rules:

  1. Be kind.
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hydroxycotton@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I thought the halo ce was generally very well received. Is the hate for it a lemmy generation thing?

[–] bigboig@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

Alotta half-life and older shooter fans blame the modern console shooter style on halo.

I've been playing for the first time a while back. It's neat, but I think the primary reason people love it so much is that it's the first popular console FPS that didn't control horribly and split screen co-op. On it's own it's just a decent shooter that no longer feels special.

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It is and it’s certainly a better game than HL.

[–] weirdo_from_space@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's not hard to be honest, time wasn't kind to HL 1.

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

It was revolutionary and changed a lot in game design on a significant number of fronts. It just aged poorly as others iterated and replaced its aspects. Halo has aged well mainly because (like most Bungie titles) it still feels like a modern title due to how tight, responsive, smooth, and intuitive the player’s interaction with the world is — mainly the controls and weapons.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago

I thought the halo ce was generally very well received.

So was a whole bunch of other FPS tripe that glorified USian militarism.