this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2024
1122 points (98.2% liked)

People Twitter

5392 readers
415 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works
pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
1122
The value of x (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 2 months ago by sjmarf@sh.itjust.works to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
138 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] switchboard_pete@fedia.io 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

the answers here assume that the base is a continuous, straight line

given one of the angles on the left triangle is a right angle on the diagram, but 80 if you calculate it, you can't assume that

[–] brisk@aussie.zone 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is a standard way to draw geometric proofs, it's not at all unreasonable to assume straight lines and unrepresentative angles.

[–] switchboard_pete@fedia.io 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

normally in a geometric proof, a right angle is a right angle

[–] brisk@aussie.zone 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This was certainly not my experience in high school. An unlabelled angle could never be assumed. Only angles marked with a square could be taken as right angles.

[–] MeThisGuy@feddit.nl 2 points 2 months ago

guess you're right!