brisk

joined 1 year ago
[–] brisk@aussie.zone 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Blinx: The time sweeper

Thanks for bringing that up, I played the shit out of Blinx 2 back when and had all but forgotten it.

Incidentally my first thought reading your comment was "Prince of Persia: Sands of Time"

[–] brisk@aussie.zone 3 points 1 week ago

Interesting to see how different that is from Australia. In your example only lane 3 is a passing lane, and "undertaking" isn't a thing, it's completely legal to overtake in any lane.

[–] brisk@aussie.zone 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Now do the crappy mobile games

The removals also follow former Netflix gaming boss Mike Verdu — who just announced that he’s a VP of “GenAI for Games” at Netflix — telling Game File’s Stephen Totilo that the company wasn’t building interactive titles anymore.

VP of “GenAI for Games”

Oh. Oh no.

[–] brisk@aussie.zone 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

successfully clipped a gravel as big as 5 millimeters

Okay

(2 inches)

...what?

the size of a tiny granola bit

...what??

[–] brisk@aussie.zone 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There is a workaround for this, which is to use a service like JMP.chat to redirect SMS to XMPP, at which point you only need to ensure internet which is a bit of a lower requirement than specific networks (but of course may still become more limiting over time)

[–] brisk@aussie.zone 7 points 1 week ago

It's too early to be certain, but I've got high hopes for the future of the SHIFT 6mq.

I believe it has mainline linux support, or it is being worked on, which will be important for ongoing OS upgrades. Otherwise they have a similar philosophy to Fairphone with an important difference; SHIFT wants you to be able to upgrade their phones, not just repair them. I don't think this has been realistically tested yet, but the successor SHIFTPHONE 8 is coming out imminently, and I think we should start to see pretty soon if any of the new modules can be installed on the older model.

I've actually got the SHIFTPHONE 8 coming myself, because I got spooked by places turning off 3G already and wanted to "future proof" with 5G, but otherwise would have preferred the 6mq.

The one caveat is that SHIFT is a very small company, which could mean risk for long term support.

[–] brisk@aussie.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago

I'm not very familiar with consumer co-ops beyond "the thing that keeps popping up when I try to look into worker co-ops". What do you get out of a multi-stakeholder co-op that's better than a pure worker's co-op?

[–] brisk@aussie.zone 14 points 3 weeks ago (18 children)

What do the exclamation points mean?

[–] brisk@aussie.zone 49 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

No. "New moon" is just the night side of the moon facing us. A lunar eclipse is when the Earth blocks sunlight from the moon, which can only occur on a full moon approximately every six months.

[–] brisk@aussie.zone 7 points 3 weeks ago

If I read that right, the normal way. It's not a special lock, just the normal lock screen. The use case seems to be addressing the idea of your phone being snatched while unlocked, and then attempted brute forcing into apps with sensitive data pin/biometric locks

[–] brisk@aussie.zone 1 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

What thing called turtle are you referring to?

[–] brisk@aussie.zone 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

You would be giving up some feed-rate control and retraction. Probably not too bad with certain materials and large scale prints, but I'd be surprised if you could do anything moderately precise with this.

 

Highlights:

Krishnan told Ars that "Meta is trying to have it both ways, but its assertion that Unfollow Everything 2.0 would violate its terms effectively concedes that Zuckerman faces what the company says he does not—a real threat of legal action."

For users wanting to take a break from endless scrolling, it could potentially meaningfully impact mental health—eliminating temptation to scroll content they did not choose to see, while allowing them to remain connected to their networks and still able to visit individual pages to access content they want to see.

According to Meta, its terms of use prohibit automated access to users' personal information not just by third parties but by individual users, as a means of protecting user privacy. Meta urged the court to reject Zuckerman's claim that Meta's terms violate California privacy laws by making it hard for users to control their data. Instead, Meta said the court should agree with a prior court that "rejected the argument that California law 'espous[es] a principle of user control of data sufficient to invalidate' Facebook’s prohibition on automated access."

Much more in article

 

Verge editor laments the perverse incentives of SEO rankings.

 
view more: next ›