brisk

Australia's system is IRV (for the federal government / lower house). Schulze is significantly better.

IRV has the tendency to eliminate moderate candidates in the first round (only first preferences count in the first round) which is often where Condorcet candidates lie.

IRV doesn't enforce two parties like FPTP but it still promotes polarisation.

and work stops while they call an ambulance?

Amazon workers told to work around dead colleague

Debian votes using the Schulze Method, which is a Condorcet method..

Condorcet methods attempt to answer the question "who would win if we asked everyone to vote on every pair of candidates". Most of the variations between methods deal vary only where there are cyclic preferences e.g. people vote B over A, A over C and C over B.

They're broadly considered the fairest voting systems available and they permit a candidate that everyone thinks is okay to win over polarising candidates (unlike first past the post and IRV, but like approval voting).

Back to the numbers, the big table is the reconstruction of the pairwise votes (people actually vote by ranking candidates but the ordering is taken to show your pairwise preferences)

Below that is the Schulze process steps being carried out. At the bottom the "Schwartz set" is the set of top, cyclic candidates. There is no cycle so there is only one candidate remaining and therefore a Condorcet candidate wins (the one people in general vote over everyone else).

It's not something people reasoned their way towards, it's constructed propaganda from the Fox News or Prager U crowd (I forget which). They discovered a long time ago that if they want their audiences to hate something that they can just straight up lie about what it is.

There's a start stand up button?? I've never seen that - what does it even do?

The important bit is further down

Our Phillips tips follow the ISO 8764-1 standard, which is compatible with the JIS standard B 4633. In fact, of the three main standards, ASME, ISO, and JIS, the least strict standard is JIS. As shown below, the JIS dimensions almost all fall within the ASME or ISO acceptable dimensions. Therefore, any Phillips screwdriver, such as our new Tekton Phillips screwdrivers, can be made to meet JIS standards. In fact, you should expect that all well-made drivers that meet the ASME or ISO standards will also meet the JIS standard.

But yes, this doesn't make clear if this has changed over time.

And yes, I used a Phillips screwdriver in JIS and vice versa multiple times.

That's totally fine actually

Interesting topic, awful article. Three photos, none of which are of the subject of the article, and all of which are captioned with the article title instead of real captions?

Here's the actual car:

I got it from this much better article from TechCrunch

And here's the the associated project, noRecognition. It's a run of ai adversarial clothes.

If it helps there's a standalone version of the logic.

At a rough scan, it looks like it tries to find a best guess "main content" node by stripping unlikely nodes and then scoring each node. Element type and content contribute to the score

/**
       * Loop through all paragraphs, and assign a score to them based on how content-y they look.
       * Then add their score to their parent node.
       *
       * A score is determined by things like number of commas, class names, etc. Maybe eventually link density.
       **/

Add a photo if you can.

From this disassembly video it looks like a typical single cell LiPo battery. This wiki page describes it as a LiPo 3.7V 800mAh. Any LiPo that matches the voltage (which should be any 1 cell LiPo) that physically fits should be fine.

I haven't had the chance to watch, but according to the comments it's Barnes Hut.

The origin of the hobby 3D printer is the RepRap project, a community open hardware project. Josef Prusa was actively involved. The first printer the company actively sold - the Prusa i3 - is still on the RepRap website.

They got a bit more restrictive with their licencing terms in the recent past which is both understandable and a bit of a slap in the face to where they came from, but they're still the most open 3D printer manufacturer.

(Not the most open 3d printer though, that award has to go to DIY only models like the Voron)