this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2023
203 points (98.6% liked)

News

37696 readers
2074 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Texas state police will not discipline any more of its officers over the Uvalde school shooting that left 19 children and two teachers dead as heavily armed agents hesitated to confront the lone gunman, a spokesperson confirmed Friday.

The decision is a turning point nearly nine months after one of the worst school attacks in U.S. history, and the widespread outrage over the officers who allowed more than 70 minutes to go by before stopping the massacre.

It also raises new questions about how many of the nearly 400 law enforcement personnel who were at Robb Elementary School last May might face discipline. They came from a constellation of agencies in South Texas, including the Texas Department of Public Safety, U.S. Border Patrol and local police. Two DPS officers have been fired, and one of them is appealing his termination.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yes, the parents. How many gun-owning members of the public without children inside volunteered to go in shooting, since they promised everyone they'd be safer if we kept the dogshit gun laws that armed the murderer in the first place?

The reality is that for all their flowery rhetoeic, gun owners only care about their own self interests. The middle-aged, morbidly obese man who wouldn't even wear a mask is not going to fight a tyrant for you. He just wanted to keep his toys.

And if they don't care about people being murdered with legal guns, why should I care about them being murdered because they didn't have a legal gun?

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

The reality is that for all their flowery rhetoeic, gun owners only care about their own self interests.

I mean yes, sorta. The selling point of guns is that you can defend yourself. The good guy with a gun part is secondary.

Also this us vs them mentality doesn't seem good for productive discussion.

[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

I mean yes, sorta. The selling point of guns is that you can defend yourself. The good guy with a gun part is secondary.

The good guy with a gun is also a lie. If you want to strip out the flowery rhetoric and promises that are never delivered, sure, go ahead. You're left with a group of people who are happy to put other people in danger for their own (often false) sense of security.

Also this us vs them mentality doesn't seem good for productive discussion.

Nope, fuck that. They've had 20 years of polite discussion and potential compromise and they've done nothing. It clearly is us vs them.