this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2024
706 points (99.0% liked)

politics

19098 readers
3338 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 34 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Can you count backwards by 7s

counting backwards in multiples of 7? i'd struggle with that and i consider myself at least average

[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 37 points 2 weeks ago

0, -7, -14, -22... dangit

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It’s probably like field sobriety tests, where how you struggle is relevant. If you miss one in a sequence, that says something different from repeatedly going up instead of down or counting backwards on your hands first.

[–] Takumidesh@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I would need to use my hands or count out loud or do something after maybe two numbers if we are starting at 100.

Trying it out just now and the only way I can really effectively do it is by subbing 10 and adding three each time.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

That’s literally what they taught my niece to do in math, so that’s not inherently a problem.

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If this were the entire question, I'd be confused. Another comment suggested starting from 0 and going into negatives, but my initial response would be "starting from what?" expecting to start at 100 or 77 or something.

However, an elementary school teacher told me that negative numbers don't exist, so that might be related ...

[–] Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

So I'm not in debt??? What a relief!

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The teacher's argument was that if you took seven pencils away from five pencils, you'd have negative two pencils, but negative pencils aren't a thing.

You could try making the same argument to your bank, replacing "pencils" with your local currency.

Let me know how it goes!

[–] Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

I don't think I'm a sovereign enough citizen to pull this off.

[–] theterrasque@infosec.pub 1 points 2 weeks ago

Banks hate this simple trick

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

It's a common test for concussion. Voice of experience.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Doing arithmetics quickly is a skill that is slowly dying out of the general population. When we all used cache we had this with us all the time, but now we just don't use it that often, generally, on average

[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

just as well, i always struggled with it.

And my teachers at school used to say "You wont always have a calculator on you"

Look at me now, i spend 7.5 hours a day paid to sit in front of an expensive calculator with two other expensive calculators in my pocket. after which i spend several hours on my own personal expensive calculator before going to bed and doom scrolling on one of the aforementioned.... expensive calculators.

Anything more than the most basic mental arithmetic at school was a waste of time that would have been better spent teaching me how to code. would have saved me teaching myself a few years later after working a soul crushing call centre job for 4 years (in which i used a not very expensive and dog shit slow calculator)