this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2024
226 points (95.9% liked)

Technology

59358 readers
5091 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 90 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Holup, The Terminator, one of the most popular sci fi movies of all time, is a “B-movie” now?

The one with Arnold?

Tf?

[–] exasperation@lemm.ee 48 points 1 week ago (1 children)

is a “B-movie” now?

Did you not read the article? It was regarded as a B-movie when it came out: a low-budget sci-fi slasher/horror film. Arnold referred to it as a B-movie when asked about it on the set of Conan the Barbarian (which had 3 times the budget as Terminator). The New York Times referred to it as a B-movie in its review, as discussed by this article, which is also why the headline uses quotes around "B-movie."

[–] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 49 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Did you not read the article?

Brother, he ain't even gonna read your reply, let alone the article.

[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 8 points 1 week ago

Honest. I like it.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 36 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

"B movie" is insane. But what they accomplished with their low budget is phenomenal, if that's what they mean...

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 47 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I too was shocked and a bit offended that it was called a B movie. But the budget was a freaking measly $6.4 million.
That's peanuts even back in 1984.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Terminator

Indeed they accomplished a lot, an all time classic movie. Some of my friends were a bit critical about the stop motion not being very good in their opinion. But I just thought the movie was amazing.

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Unpopular opinion: too big budget gives a bad movie. Lower budgets forces people to be more creative and keeps the suits away that would otherwise make it a designs by committee.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That can be the case, but IMO Terminator 2 was an amazing follow up, and it had 15 times bigger budget.

[–] exasperation@lemm.ee 8 points 1 week ago

James Cameron has a history of making great things happen with a low budget, and spending millions responsibly to actually make a positive difference in big budget films.

[–] zewm@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Hindsight. But the franchise didn’t blow up until Terminator 2.

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

It was written by AI probably, so it wants us to not believe what it's learning to do is very good. Just ignore it, human.