this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
223 points (97.0% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

3330 readers
802 users here now

Rules:

Also feel free to check out !leopardsatemyface@lemm.ee (also active).

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 38 points 4 days ago (17 children)

Now it is Latinos but once Stephen Miller pushes denaturalization bill through, Asians (mainly Indians and Chinese) are going to be next.

And I don't know about Chinese but there are plenty of Indians who love Trump, usually along with Modi (I do NOT want to see that rule34). They're in for a rude surprise when their H-1B or Green card is revoked along with citizenship of their born in the US children.

[–] osugi_sakae@midwest.social 8 points 4 days ago (4 children)

along with citizenship of their born in the US children

Totally agree with your point, but I have a bit of hope regarding the citizenship point. Birthright citizenship is a result of the 14th amendment, so revoking it would be very difficult. I wouldn't be surprised if maybe they try to ignore court decisions, or just deport people without due process. But, getting rid of the 14th wouldn't happen, so things could be undone (in theory).

CNN article on the 14th Amendment: https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/31/us/14th-amendment-birthright-citizenship-explainer-trnd/index.html

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago

The law only matters when it's enforced, and the current supreme court has already shown they will not uphold the Constitution when it suits them and their politics.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 7 points 3 days ago

SCOTUS "See, if the founding fathers really thought birth right citizenship was important. They would have put it in the Constitution. It's an amendment and we all know amendments were not part of the orginal text so therefore, we rule that the 14th amendment was never in enforce."

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

wouldn't stop them from putting the kids in the system and deporting the parents

[–] nzeayn@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

boarding schools run by 'good christian folk' on large plots of empty land, just like the not that distant past.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

The law? These people only care about power. If they want to start shipping out Indian children that were born here, they'll do it, and tell any complainers to talk to the (Republican) judge.

load more comments (12 replies)