this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
49 points (94.5% liked)

Technology

59472 readers
3029 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 8 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Big "but what was she wearing?" energy here.

I don't give a shit if she's doing Shein bikini hauls on Youtube. If you use AI to nudify her pictures, you're manufacturing child pornography, and deserve the full consequences for doing that.

As for OnlyFans, they are quite strict about age requirements. Children aren't running OF accounts. You just hate women and needed to bring up OF to slut-shame.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org -1 points 2 hours ago

If you use AI to nudify her pictures, you're manufacturing child pornography, and deserve the full consequences for doing that.

Somebody in non US satellite foreign state can go and do that now from the youtube "bikini hauls" since they publicly avaoialble

What are you or the feds gonna about that, chief?

If that is your or her concern, don't post pictures online. Otherwise, you are literally the mercy of the internet. Privacy 101.

I am sure giving feds extra powers on this won't end like everything else, ie abused against lesser peons.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world -1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

If you use AI to nudify her pictures, you’re manufacturing child pornography, and deserve the full consequences for doing that.

No, equating this to an actual child being raped is incorrect. These are not crimes of remotely equal magnitude.

Comparing a person who raped a child, made photos and distributed them to a person who used Photoshop or an AI tool is, other than just evil, reducing the meaning of the former.

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

It is weird how hard you have been defending the production of child pornography in this thread.

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 2 points 28 minutes ago

Fr, bro is giving off some strong Trumpist vibes.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 0 points 31 minutes ago

What this conversation is about has as much to do with child pornography as hentai with loli characters.

You just can't argue without unsubstantiated accusations, can you?

When real living people are being murdered and abused in droves, you are still worried more about glorified automated Photoshop and accusing its users of being the same as actual rapists.