this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
437 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

59402 readers
4094 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jeremy@lemmy.dexlit.xyz 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How would that make youtube worse?

[–] neshura@bookwormstory.social 18 points 1 year ago

They'll find a way, I'm sure

[–] Granixo@feddit.cl 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I'm not saying that AV2/H.266 would make Youtube worse.

I'm implying AV2/H.266 would allow us to migrate to a platform other than Youtube.

Edit: Added AV2 to my comment

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

Why do we need h.266 for that? (Looking at PeerTube)

[–] Rinox@feddit.it 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why would that be? If h265 is anything to go by, MPEG will probably charge an arm and a leg for h266, and the entire industry will pivot away from MPEG and move to AV2. I'm not even sure YouTube will ever implement h266

[–] Granixo@feddit.cl 2 points 1 year ago

I had completly forgotten about AV2, my bad.