this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2024
322 points (99.4% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5392 readers
258 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Steve 54 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

I genuinely don't understand the logic behind stopping these.
Can anyone help me make sense of it?

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 47 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Same thing with everything he does. Just for the cruelty

[–] Steve 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

No. That's too easy and dismissive. It doesn't even realy make sense.
Revenge maybe. But I doubt it.
There's some logical reasoning here. Something that makes sense, even if the goal it's self is senseless.

[–] lettruthout@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago (2 children)

A friend‘s company will get the contract instead? Of course the vehicles would have ICEs, making his oil company friends happy? The cruelty would just be a bonus

[–] Steve 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Something like that. But which friend? Which company?

[–] vaionko@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Maybe Musk wants to make them instead?

[–] Steve 1 points 1 week ago

That would make sense.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

Try to get him to settle for hybrid, install small ICE into vehicle, show functionality upon rollout, retune software later to not actually use ICE. Lol

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What are you new? Since when does he make sense?

[–] Steve 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It all makes sense when you see him as a child. An insecure narcissist, who thinks the world exists for his benefit. So how does this fit into that?

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sometimes children break things just to break things

[–] Steve 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Even when they do, they're exploring and discovering their ability to effect the world, or how things work. It's not for no reason.

[–] ignirtoq@fedia.io 4 points 1 week ago

Yeah, and that's where the child analogy fails. He's not actually a child. He's not learning and exploring the world. Learning is likely one of the things Trump hates the most, because it would imply he doesn't already know the answer.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There's always a reason, even if it's childish. I'm guessing someone in the petro industry whined in his ear. Or someone whined that he should hate the USPS. Who knows.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago

Did everyone just collectively forget about his efforts to crush USPS? DeJoy? All of it?

Mail-in voting is still a danger to him, and privatising the mail system has been a goal for conservatives for a long time now.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

Oil interests gave $75 million to Trump's campaign. That's the "logic".

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Friend.. Are you still trying to make sense of any of this? You poor poor soul. I want to give you a hug.

[–] Steve 7 points 1 week ago

I appreciate that. Thank you

[–] OmnipotentEntity@beehaw.org 13 points 1 week ago

It pisses off liberals. Literally the only thing that matters to him.

[–] satanmat@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because it wasn’t his plan. Literally if anyone else does it it is bad. Trump is the most important and his ideas are the best

If only he could make them run on whale oil and pay twice as much they would be so much better

[–] Steve 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's the case with literally everything in the government pre 2016.
Why roll back this thing, and a few others? What's the line separating them from everything else?

[–] satanmat@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Well nothing…

He’s wanted to kill the ACA because Obama. But hasn’t had a plan in 8 years?

Air Force One, had be be redone after he cancelled Obama’s planned version. So his big brain re did it for a higher price and now is delayed until after 2028 ; so he now won’t get to fly it.

I’ve not talked to him about it, but I’m guessing that he 1, hates electric cars and 2, hates anything not trump.

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago

Elon has his arm up Trump's ass.

Own the libs. That's the whole thing.