this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
1134 points (99.1% liked)

Funny

6997 readers
477 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

~~I don't think your units make sense


kinetic energy has units of energy, but "kg TNT per second" is power (about 4MW). (I think just remove the "every second" and it's correct?)~~

Edit: parent edited comment.

[–] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You're right, but "every second" was meant more as a display of the energy in the train, like a large explosion "every second". Is that very wrong?

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hmmm, I'm not sure I understand...

A large explosion every second has units of power, not energy. So to me this is suggesting that the train is putting out power equal to its kinetic energy per second. That's certainly not the case


it implies that the train is powerful enough to accelerate to the speed in 1s, which is definitely not true.

But that's just my interpretation.

[–] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago

Yeah, I forgot that a large part of the energy is in inertia and not the pulling of the engine.