this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2024
412 points (97.5% liked)

Android

28183 readers
339 users here now

DROID DOES

Welcome to the droidymcdroidface-iest, Lemmyest (Lemmiest), test, bestest, phoniest, pluckiest, snarkiest, and spiciest Android community on Lemmy (Do not respond)! Here you can participate in amazing discussions and events relating to all things Android.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


1. All posts must be relevant to Android devices/operating system.


2. Posts cannot be illegal or NSFW material.


3. No spam, self promotion, or upvote farming. Sources engaging in these behavior will be added to the Blacklist.


4. Non-whitelisted bots will be banned.


5. Engage respectfully: Harassment, flamebaiting, bad faith engagement, or agenda posting will result in your posts being removed. Excessive violations will result in temporary or permanent ban, depending on severity.


6. Memes are not allowed to be posts, but are allowed in the comments.


7. Posts from clickbait sources are heavily discouraged. Please de-clickbait titles if it needs to be submitted.


8. Submission statements of any length composed of your own thoughts inside the post text field are mandatory for any microblog posts, and are optional but recommended for article/image/video posts.


Community Resources:


We are Android girls*,

In our Lemmy.world.

The back is plastic,

It's fantastic.

*Well, not just girls: people of all gender identities are welcomed here.


Our Partner Communities:

!android@lemmy.ml


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Not sure if this is the correct place to post, but I just wanna kinda rant a bit.

I'm not the only one that hates this, right?

An app can just do a "This App Does Not Allow Screenshots"? Like... wtf?

Like, its my phone, and some app can just decide to disable a fuction of my phone. It's my phone and if I wanna take a screenshot, I'm taking a screenshot. I don't care about whatever "security" the app developer wants.

Imagine if every online shopping app whether fast food or amazon, just used this to block you from taking a screenshot so you can't save the records in case of a dispute.

Which android developer thought it was a good idea to let an app disable a function on your phone. Even iPhone doesn't have this stupid concept.

Sorry for the rant.

Anyone wanna share your stories?

(P.S. I have a cheap secondary phone to take photos of the screen. "This App Does Not Allow Screenshots" my ass lmao, I'm taking the screenshot whether the app wants it or not.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HeavyRaptor@lemmy.zip 48 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That's nothing. My workplace disabled copy/paste on everyone's work iPhones completely. Not in their own apps but system wide. Apparently that's something ios allows them to do. Doesn't affect me much because I use the phone as a glorified dual auth token but some people have it as their primary phone.

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 6 days ago

I have never heard of copying and pasting being disabled in iOS. I’m sorry, but this claim is dubious.

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

work iPhones

some people have it as their primary phone.

Bruh, I have no idea how people can put up with their employer being able control their device. Like... the employer can freak out about some perceived "security breach" and decide to wipe everyone's phone and you lose all your data like photos. Also, their employer can see if they are shit talking about the employer or mangement people, and it's a terrible idea if they want to unionize.

[–] Pfeffy@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They are okay with it because it isn't their phone. It's a free phone that comes with the job.

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

"Free"

hmm I rather not... like its not just "privacy" you'd have to worry about, there can be potentially a rogue employee of the company just stealing all your bank info and possibly steal your identity. Might be a "free" phone, but there's just much more risks than just getting a cheap android phone. People don't think this though and only think about the "free". Dealing with identity theft is not fun. If only people understand the risks... 🤦‍♂️

[–] solrize@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Don't put personal stuff on your work phone. Use your own phone for that. If you have trouble carrying both, hit the gym.

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Yea exactly. I would just carry 2 phones, but I'm just saying: I don't understand how other people just use their work phone for personal use simply because it's "free"

[–] frostysauce@lemmy.world -3 points 5 days ago

Obviously they are less concerned about things you are quite concerned about. I'm sure there are things that concern them and that you don't give a shit about.

[–] solrize@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Yes it's just a terrible idea. People do all sorts of dumb things though.

[–] Dhs92@programming.dev 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As an IT guy that manages MDMs, no we cannot see communications on the device

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As another guy that does, yeah we can push ediscovery apps to the phone and pull all kinds of data

[–] Tricky@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Something I've been dying to ask an industry expert. If your users setup a second user profile on android , and exclusively uses the second profile for work-related apps (assume full control), can you see the contents of the first (unrelated) user profile?

My work phone battery lasts for like 5-6 days because I only have Slack, MFA app, and outlook on it. It's crazy to use it for personal use