this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
234 points (100.0% liked)

Not The Onion

12666 readers
1140 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 94 points 7 hours ago (8 children)

UnitedHealthcare suggested in a comment to Newsweek that it did not call Potter during surgery, saying, "There are no insurance related circumstances that would require a physician to step out of surgery and it would create potential safety risks if they were to do so. We did not ask nor would ever expect a physician to interrupt patient care to answer a call and we will be following up with the provider and hospital to understand why these unorthodox actions were taken."

Maybe UHC just needs to read the article they are quoted in to get the answer:

In a follow-up video, Potter said on Wednesday that insurance companies have created "a fear-based system where, if an insurance company calls me and says I've got to call them right back, I'm afraid they're not going to pay for my patient's surgery, that patient is going to get stuck with a bill."

So the answer is: Doctors and patients are so afraid of doing anything that might be an excuse to let UHC deny covering the healthcare procedures. This fear isn't manufactured by doctors or patients. Its a direct result of UHCs prior actions.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 48 points 6 hours ago (7 children)

See, what I'M hearing is that united for years denied people health care that they NEEDED. Then their CEO gets capped, and now all the sudden united is like "Whaaaaat??? We would NEVER do something that put patients lives at risk......wasn't us! We're being good boys now."

Which tells me that Luigi had a direct impact. Before these CEOs were like "I do what I want!!!" And with no consequences, they did what they want.

NOW these CEOs are like "HOLY FUCK!!! THESE GUYS ARE BRINGING CONSEQUENCES!!!! COOL THE HEAT!!! COOL THE HEAT!!!

And now they're rethinking their ways. Not stopping mind you, but trying to appear less like something the devil running a company would do.

So thank you Luigi. Somewhere out there in the world right now is someone getting their care approved, whereas without you, it would have been denied.

[–] earphone843@sh.itjust.works 24 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Huh? This is like the 3rd shit they've tried to pull since the CEO was killed. They clearly don't care about changing their ways. They only backtrack when there's publicity.

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

3rd? It's all but certain that there are tens of thousands of other examples of this BS that haven't been reported.

[–] earphone843@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 hours ago

You're right. It's the third shit that's gotten media attention.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)