this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
805 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

59219 readers
3230 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Seems like a lot of companies are testing how much they can get away with lately.

[–] Asuracharya@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes and people are paying unfortunately Netflix succeeded and now everyone is trying ads πŸ˜”

[–] BigT54@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So I'm really confused about the whole Netflix thing. It hasn't asked me to set a household location and the whole no password sharing thing was supposed to have taken effect back in May, right? Since May, my family has continued to use Netflix as if nothing has changed and we said if they try to charge us extra, we will cancel. Our Netflix is regularly used at 4 different "households" and they have yet to charge a fee and have not automatically set a household like they claimed they would.

[–] Asuracharya@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I was talking about advertisement in Netflix

[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

This happens when you have to grow endlessly and hit a ceiling (in this case, number of users). Then you have to squeeze those users further so the numbers go up again. Of course you are killing the product in the long run because more and more users cancel but that's not a big deal to the people making the decisions. (Well, the people doing actual work might object but nobody cares about them.) The shareholders that got obscenely rich will just leech onto the next big thing and the CEOs sail to their next product to ruin with a huge golden parachute. Rinse and repeat. Meanwhile, civilisation crumbles and decays, before it burns in the sadly inevitable climate catastrophe.

[–] letsgocrazy@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

But Amazon crumbling isn't civilisation crumbling... In fact, it opens doors for more small business owners.

[–] Borkingheck@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You are incorrect though. Netflix and Uber (or any ride sharing app) have shown once people are hooked they will pay the increased rate to consume the product.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Call it what is is: GREEDFLATION.

[–] ItsMeSpez@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Da_Boom@iusearchlinux.fyi 2 points 1 year ago

Nah, at this point anything subscription related is technofeudalism

[–] geolaw@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Actual management strategy is "you don't know what your boundaries are until you push against them"

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Actual management strategy is β€œyou don’t know what your boundaries are until you push against them”

This is why it's so important not to get tired and quit, but instead to always push back.