this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2023
479 points (97.1% liked)

News

36439 readers
2982 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

California cannot ban gun owners from having detachable magazines that hold more than 10 rounds, a federal judge ruled Friday.

The decision from U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez won’t take effect immediately. California Attorney General Rob Bonta, a Democrat, has already filed a notice to appeal the ruling. The ban is likely to remain in effect while the case is still pending.

This is the second time Benitez has struck down California’s law banning certain types of magazines. The first time he struck it down — way back in 2017 — an appeals court ended up reversing his decision.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Makes it so less magazines are put on the black market. Just like a total gun ban would dry up the black market. In US and Mexico.

[–] jeremy_sylvis@midwest.social 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 years ago

10rnd AR-15 .458 SOCOM mags have entered the chat

[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Nobody gives a fuck what criminals and terrorists could hypothetically use, they care about what they are using, which in nearly 80% of mass shootings is a legal firearm.

[–] Vytle@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

"Mass shooting" refers to any shooting where 3 or more people are injured, and it usually happens in areas with high unemployment. Kinda sounds like a class issue to me.

[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee -3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Cool well fix the class issue and then you can have your guns back.

[–] jeremy_sylvis@midwest.social 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You have it backwards - fix the class issues and you'll have nothing to bitch about regarding firearms.

That is, unless you just hate firearms.

[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee -3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Nah. You think it's the problem, you can prove it's the solution.

[–] jeremy_sylvis@midwest.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I believe we're still waiting for you to show guns are somehow the problem.

[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yep, we know. It's the climate change denier strategy. However much evidence there is, demand even more before you'll consider acting.

But who gives a shit if you're ever convinced? We can just build something without your rubber stamp of approval and you can join the ranks of people who opposed things like food safety and DUI laws.

[–] jeremy_sylvis@midwest.social 1 points 2 years ago

Yep, we know. It’s the climate change denier strategy. However much evidence there is, demand even more before you’ll consider acting.

Arguably, we're still waiting for any evidence at all supporting the notion it's the firearms that are the root of the violence problem rather than merely the implement used.

The analog here would be that you seem to only care climate change can be caused by residential cars to the complete neglect of the fossil fuel contributions of the energy industry.

But who gives a shit if you’re ever convinced? We can just build something without your rubber stamp of approval and you can join the ranks of people who opposed things like food safety and DUI laws.

Feel free to find any support for the notion that I - or others here - have opposed such things.

Take all the time you need.

When you've accepted failure, consider adopting positions which may actually address root issues here rather than continuing to clutch your pearls most tightly about those darned firearms.

[–] sudo22@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

How'd that work out for the drug bans? Cause man I could buy so much weed in college (in an illegal state), and trust me I literally never asked.

[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee -4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

How many people offered you rocket launchers? Hand grenades? Land mines? High explosives?

[–] sudo22@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

None because you can 3D print those.

[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee -3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Please please please print yourself an RPG.

[–] sudo22@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sure

(Not me obv but you get the point)

[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee -4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And you clearly didn't get mine. You print yourself an RPG and fire it. Use an actual 3D printer that you actually own, print yourself an RPG (and whatever ammo you need for it), hold it in your own hands and fire it.

People have walked on the moon. You can link a YouTube video of it and pretend you totally could too if you wanted to.

[–] sudo22@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

No? I don't want one, and that's mainly because I don't have the land to test it. Its something I want to do one day once I own significant acherage.

I have however, printed fully functional firearms (G19x, FGC-9, AR-15, others). An RPG is well within feasibility of modern desktop printers. Look on YouTube or FossCAD on Reddit if you don't believe me. RPGs, Grenade Launchers, Silencers, full guns, and plenty other improvised weapons are fully printable with plenty of examples online. And perfectly legal for most US citizens to make.