this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2025
1890 points (99.0% liked)

pics

20298 readers
455 users here now

Rules:

1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer

2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

Photo of the Week Rule(s):

1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.

2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

Weeks 2023

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win 98 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Is this real? Nobody is reporting on it.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 107 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Which of the conservative media in the US do you expect to report it?

[–] fosho@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago

but all the mainstream media is run by libruls.

[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

This does appear to be the state department flag pole (on 21st street looking East from the state department). And it does appear to be winter, and there is construction in that area around the fed building. But that's all I can say. The photo is weirdly blurry and grainy so be suspicious.

[–] obinice@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

The photo is weirdly blurry and grainy so be suspicious.

You mean the filthy window? Yeah, something tells me they get pollution there and don't clean the outside of the windows as often as they should. I've seen that kinda filthy often enough on office windows.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 50 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I'm surprised they haven't pulled it the way they went ban crazy this morning.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 26 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Right??? Protest coordination on traditional social media is like… iffy now, at best.

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It really makes me wonder how people were able to pull this shit off in the 50s, 60s and 70s when we can't make it happen today with everything available to us.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago

They still had third places where they could organize face-to-face. Think union halls, fraternal organizations (which us Millennials only know about from old cartoons), churches, etc.

See also this Adam Conover video, which isn't specifically about organizing to protest but nevertheless is pretty insightful about it.

[–] 51dusty@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

they didn't use maligned, monitored areas for communication.... people today should coordinate face-to-face or at worst via telephone if they haven't already exposed themselves.

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 2 days ago

Telephones have been insecure for at least 20 years. Cellphones have backdoors built into the protocol standards. Face-to-face or good encryption are the options.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

Oddly, the recent thing in LA was via TikTok, but to be fair their knee bending is probably superficial at best.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org -5 points 2 days ago

Based on white people Twitter ban this is similar to Luigi situation...

People are just overwhelming their modding ability.

It will be taken down and the opposition sentiment will be supressed in due course.

[–] Probius@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Why does the flag have no stars?

Because the image quality is poor

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It clearly does have stars. They just blur into the field because the quality isn't high enough. Zoom in and you can see there's slightly whiter dots where the stars should be. You just can't really make them out.

[–] Probius@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 days ago

The real problem with AI is that you have to be so damn skeptical even of real posts.

I'm only seeing one source so far. Not mainstream.

[–] M137@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

You write that like you're sure it's not real, and/or that others would or should think so. There's no obvious thing pointing towards it being fake by just looking at the photo, no clear editing signs or anything like that. But we should make sure it is real by finding other photos, there must be more if it is real. And if there was ever a time in our lifetimes where this would be real, it's now.