Not The Onion

13191 readers

1152 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

kescusay@lemmy.world

160

Why not let workers live in the office? (www.thetimes.com)

submitted 19 hours ago by Samdell@lemmynsfw.com to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

49 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] gonzo-rand19@moist.catsweat.com 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

To actually address the question, it's because commercial buildings don't (generally) meet residential building code requirements, even if there's a kitchenette and a shower, etc. They are simply not meant for the same purpose or to be occupied 24/7 unless they were engineered that way from the start, which is exceedingly rare. A lot of office buildings have floor-to-ceiling windows and complex HVAC systems simply to make sure people aren't cold, breathing stale air, or too humid/dry, so they also use a lot of energy.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 2 points 4 hours ago

Also fire safety, if you have people sleeping in the building you need a much higher level of protection.