Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
view the rest of the comments
On top of that, that research discounted 2 out of hundreds of possibilities.
Again, there is no evidence that pheromones affect humans. Just speculation and your baseless belief.
If we had a shred of evidence, corporations would be knocking themselves out trying to produce human pheromones. LOL, imagine a spray that makes you attractive.
No, the research I linked is evidence that pheromones affect humans. The evidence you present shows 2 specific hormones aren't them. Understand the difference.
No, it’s not. It’s just a long claim. It links to no studies showing any evidence.
Of course, if you actually have any evidence, the entire scientific world would love to see it. Because, until now, no such evidence exists.
Yes it is. Read the whole thing. The whole scientific world has seen it which is why the scientists you referenced themselves "believe human pheromones likely exist".
It really isn’t though. It’s just some writer making claims without any evidence to back it up. Nothing you say is gonna change that.
Best of luck
Blocked
For anyone else that is interested in this and would like to read the actual study.