274
Court hearing goes 'exceptionally badly' for Trump DOJ as judge loses patience: reporter
(www.rawstory.com)
this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2025
274 points (98.2% liked)
politics
20464 readers
2618 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
No, I have not.
Edited to add - https://www.project2025.observer/
Then you haven't been paying attention. I've said this a million times before for people saying what you're saying: the executive has less far reaching power than Congress or Judicial for a reason. This is that reason.
Judges can arrest anyone attempting to enforce these fake proclamations that are illegal.
Judges can seize assets from private banks.
Judges can put anyone in jail that refuses to comply, and Trump can't pardon them.
If these rules don't hold them there is no constitutional agreement that states need to abide, and they all immediately assume control of military assets in said states. That's the end of the US, and an immediate assault and destruction of Trump and his psychos in DC.
They won't even try to push that. They know what will happen.
Like the judges who could have locked him up before the election?
I don't think you are hearing what I'm saying. My faith in our institutions is done. Kaput. I will happily eat a serving of crow if needed, but that's gonna have to be a good sales pitch because if our institutions worked we wouldn't be where we are today. We couldn't stop Trump when he had zero executive power and was not the president.
Meanwhile, we're barely a month in: https://www.project2025.observer/
edited to clarify wording of one sentence
You don't have a basic understanding of that concept or the Judicial system. Not even worth responding when you come with a fundamental idiotic understanding of how this works.
👍
Where the fuck have you been for the last 10 years? Why do you believe that laws, norms, and rules, mean anything to this gang of fucking thieves?
Judges can issue orders for all that, but they have no enforcement mechanism of their own. Enforcement of orders is done through bodies like the US Marshals, which are ultimately under the executive branch. What happens if a judge issues a ruling, but the President instructs everyone under him not to enforce it?
You're wrong. Not only wrong, but for some reason bringing up a federal law enforcement agency that most states don't even allow to operate as intended. You can watch videos about this on YouTube if you want.
I'm sure you've seen these true crime shows on TV where people are immediately taken into custody in court and sent straight to jail if found guilty. Without me going into a civics lesson, if a judge declares you guilty of a crime, law enforcement has to incarcerate you. That is the LAW part of government.
The local police are the enforcement army of this, even for federal Judges who operate at a local level.
A judge finds you guilty of a crime, your are arrested and go to jail.
This is where contempt of court comes in. If you refuse to comply with a court order, you are immediately arrested and put in jail. You are held in contempt of court for not complying with a court order. This is not under the purview of state or federal law for pardons because there is no crime committed, you are being held in contempt of court, a branch of government.
A federal judge who is telling Trump's lackeys to stop what they are doing can absolutely fire off a number of contempt charges that Trump can't intervene with.
Elon doesn't comply? Freeze his banking assets.
DOJ head doesn't comply , assume judgement and have her arrested if she steps foot in the judge's territory.
On and on until they comply.
What you're clearly not understanding is that a single judge can destroy this cabinet by simple levers provided by the constitution, and take any of the low level people into jail or also freeze their assets if they don't comply.
DOGE employee: jail and frozen assets
Local Podunk Texas cop who refuses to enforce: jail and frozen assets.
It's all the way down until people comply with the LAW, and the judges enforce these laws.
Former President Convicted of 34 Felonies: No Restrictions
THIS is what we're all screaming at you while you ask if we ever took a civics class.
TRUMP IS ABOVE THE LAW and he was above the law before he even took office this time around.
We're all handwaving away your assurances because they are all about things that CAN happen in a world where people are following the rules and things work like they should. A world that no longer exists.
You're missing the point. Trump doesn't do his own dirty work. His little underlings will be the ones going to jail.
When they do, I'll come back to acknowledge I was wrong. In the meantime, I'm not holding my breath. 4 years of that was enough.
No, you are missing mine.
My point is that nothing that happened with Trump over the course of four years that gives me ANY confidence regarding how the system will work now. (see 34 felonies case)
Your "well okay, Trump is above the law, but the folks below him might not be" is not the confidence builder you seem to think it is. When folks start going to jail (and staying there) I'll share your enthusiasm.
Edit: And it doesn't count if they are going to jail after we've reached the "rebuilding our nation from rubble" stage.
Can you expand on "and Trump can't pardon them"?
Two reasons: