this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2025
588 points (97.4% liked)

politics

21225 readers
4554 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Minnesota Governor Tim Walz has criticized the Harris-Walz 2024 presidential campaign for playing it too "safe," saying they should have held more in-person events and town halls.

In a Politico interview, Walz—known for labeling Trump and Vance as "weird"—blamed their cautious approach partly on the abbreviated 107-day campaign timeline after Harris became the nominee in August.

Using football terminology, he said Democrats were in a "prevent defense" when "we never had anything to lose, because I don't think we were ever ahead."

While acknowledging his share of responsibility for the loss, Walz is returning to the national spotlight and didn't rule out a 2028 presidential run, saying, "I'm not saying no."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gatohaus@eviltoast.org 162 points 21 hours ago (7 children)

And the Dems are, mostly, still too safe. They need to start fighting while they still have a chance of stopping the insanity.

Step 1: Schumer needs to step down.

[–] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 71 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

But they wore pink shirts and held up tiny auction bid signs!

[–] infinitevalence@discuss.online 24 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

True! Just the wild and crazy ones!

[–] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com 9 points 16 hours ago

The "radical left," per FOX "News," ladies and gentlemen.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 51 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Not just Chuck but the whole leadership of the Democrat party needs to go.

[–] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 24 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

The entire party needs to go. Let it burn and be replaced by a workers party that represents us.

[–] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

While I agree, here’s what I worry about. Even if the leadership is replaced, the culture of the Democrats is to listen to consultants, voter panels etc. It’s commendable to take voters wishes into account, but what most voters want is a leader, not a listener.

Example: during the campaign voter panels talked about inflation and immigration whereas healthcare was ranked at the bottom. Therefore Democrats did not talk about healthcare.

But this is really a chicken and egg story. If nobody talks about healthcare, voters feel that healthcare is not on the ballot, and so they won’t mention the topic in voter panels. Luigi showed (once again) that healthcare in the US is fucked and that many people in fact care deeply about the topic. I am almost sure that Harris would have done better had she made healthcare the central issue of her campaign. The moral is that as long as Democrats are following, rather than leading, they will continue to lose elections.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

They need to lead, but they also need to not just be reactionary. They should absolutely listen to what us voters are saying. But they should also be looking at the overall situation, and trying to understand why voters are not super stoked about how things are going instead of insisting “the economy is fine”. And then, maybe, I dunno, do some real, honest root cause analysis, and come up with some fucking creative solutions.

And by “they”, I mean the congresspersons themselves. Not an intern. Not a consultant. Not a lobbyist. The person who was elected. Do the work. Do your fucking job.

[–] Kalysta@lemm.ee 4 points 13 hours ago

Step 2: pelosi needs to retire.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 16 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Reducing Democrats in Congress is the opposite of progress. We should be recalling Republican congresspeople that don’t represent their constituents, or we’ll be waiting until November 2026 for our next chance to flip seats.

https://www.ncsl.org/elections-and-campaigns/recall-of-state-officials

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 14 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

People vote for Republicans because if you think Democrats are never going to do anything to help you, you might as well vote for the party that will lower your taxes. There's real problems with that logic, but it is true that Dems put serving corporations ahead of serving the people.

[–] btaf45@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Trump and the GOP raised taxes on most middle class income groups in 2017, according to the official congressional JCT analysis.

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 4 points 15 hours ago

We're talking politics, not objective reality.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

The dem leadership is absolutely too safe. The only ones saying what should be said are the ones that have no power.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 14 hours ago

Still playing safe? They're playing it even safer than before, and they have even less to lose. I don't understand what they don't get. They need to go on offense. Now is the time for it if ever. They literally have no power, so just make noise and make sure everything happening is loud and people know who's doing it.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] SailorMoss@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 hours ago

Step 3: AOC and Bernie need to take their place.