this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2025
2331 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

68131 readers
3725 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Interest in LibreOffice, the open-source alternative to Microsoft Office, is on the rise, with weekly downloads of its software package close to 1 million a week. That’s the highest download number since 2023.

“We estimate around 200 million [LibreOffice] users, but it’s important to note that we respect users’ privacy and don’t track them, so we can’t say for sure,” said Mike Saunders, an open-source advocate and a deputy to the board of directors at The Document Foundation.

LibreOffice users typically want a straightforward interface, Saunders said. “They don’t want subscriptions, and they don’t want AI being ‘helpful’ by poking its nose into their work — it reminds them of Clippy from the bad old days,” he said.

There are genuine use cases for generative AI tools, but many users prefer to opt-in to it and choose when and where to enable it. “We have zero plans to put AI into LibreOffice. But we understand the value of some AI tools and are encouraging developers to create … extensions that use AI in a responsible way,” Saunders said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] venotic@kbin.melroy.org 55 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Took them long enough.

Now how long will it take them to try Linux?

[–] FlihpFlorp@lemm.ee 49 points 6 days ago (2 children)

So here’s a single data point for you, in a good couple months (for money reasons) I was gonna switch over to Bazzite or another distro if it came preinstalled

So with a sample size of 1 we know 100% of people you’ve found are switching to linux

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 17 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It's finally (your) Year of the Linux Desktop!

[–] FlihpFlorp@lemm.ee 6 points 5 days ago
[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

for money reasons

Should we tell them Linux is free? 😀

[–] FlihpFlorp@lemm.ee 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Well there’s the small matter of the new computer

But oh NOW you tell me I don’t need to wire $600 to a random person

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You can dual boot on pretty much whatever you have, though I recommend buying a separate drive for Linux for minimum headaches.

But yeah, I get it. Linux will be there when you're ready.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Please don't suggest newcomers to dual boot. It's very technical and requires a lot of knowledge and effort to troubleshoot when windows eventually fights back with new shenanigans. It provides a skewed impression of what using Linux is like.

Just suggest to try the distros as a live USB. It gets them 90% of the way into an install, and it's perfectly safe and reversible.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Give Linux a whole, separate drive and then there's no concern about Windows doing anything.

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Yeah is that completely safe? I'm really tempted to try out Mint and I have an old M2 from my previous machine I could format and use for it. The PC is my work/editing station though so can't afford any risk. I can't really make the switch since I'm still dependent on LR+PS (Adobe...) but most of my other software should work, and I've just always wanted to get into Linux but not sure if it'll actually benefit me and my work or if it's just gonna cause me even more hassle than windows currently does.

I'm familiar with messing around in the BIOS, changing boot priority and formatting stuff and whatnot.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

As long as you're confident in being able to distinguish between the two drives (i.e. they have different capacities), you're good.

The main issue people run into w/ a dual boot setup is Windows clobbering the Linux boot loader (the thing that lets you pick whether to boot into Windows or Linux) and users not knowing how to reinstall it. It will only do that on the drive it's installed to, so if Linux is on a separate drive altogether, you'll be fine. I recommend going into the BIOS settings and switching the default boot to your Linux drive, and Linux should detect the Windows installation and give you the option to boot into either one.

LR+PS (Adobe…)

This is probably going to be an issue for you, since neither has a direct replacement on Linux. However, in the worst case scenario (you hate Linux and want to nuke it from orbit), you just need to switch the boot order back in your BIOS.

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Right that sounds reasonable then. Switching boot order is a piece of cake and the Linux drive would be the only 128gb one in the whole array (I have a lot of drives, including a setup with stablebit drivepool, will that work?). After I'm done with this current gig in a couple days I should have a small window of free time, maybe I'll finally get to it!

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

This is perfectly viable and preferable, but for most newcomers just installing a new OS is a foreign concept in and of itself.

Fair. But blowing away all their stuff can really ruin their day. Learn to enter the boot menu to switch drives, and then they can always go back to Windows if something gets borked.

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 18 points 6 days ago (5 children)

Linux needs to sound a lot less intimidating for people who don’t really do tech besides the very basics.

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 15 points 6 days ago (7 children)

people who don’t really do tech besides the very basics

i've been building my own PCs since the 90s and have basic hardware and network certs, and want to try linux, but it seems daunting to me

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The biggest issue people face when switching to Linux is finding Linux alternatives to their apps.

At this point it's much easier than it was in the 90s

That said, games can still cause issues.

[–] RushJet1@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

When I switched to Linux I found out that the Linux alternative to most of my apps was just running my windows apps through proton or wine and they work fine. There are only one or two programs that I couldn't replace and I really don't care about them so 🤷🏻‍♂️

[–] CaptainPedantic@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I've found Linux Mint to be easier to install and use than Windows. (I don't have to enter the console and allow myself to setup an offline account because no network drivers were working in Linux. Windows 11 did that).

I've never had issues with graphics drivers, despite using Nvidia cards. The only issues with Linux have been because I broke something when I was messing around.

Get a USB drive, burn a Linux ISO to it, and try it out without installing it.

[–] Madcat81@lemm.ee 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

And then something doesn't work during installation or you have to postpone it, you have to abort the installation, run into the MMOK error that blocks you from installing ANY UEFI Linux...just happend to me. I REALLY like the idea of Linux but man, if such things still happen :/.

[–] bufalo1973@lemm.ee 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Blame UEFI problems to all the shit M$ makes. It's their fault.

[–] Mavytan@feddit.nl 4 points 5 days ago

While true, that unfortunately doesn't change the reality that many potential new users will run into issues like this

But hey, the more Linux users there are, the more manufactures will be forced to fix their shit

[–] Norin@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago

I’m practically tech illiterate, but managed to switch myself over to Linux after watching some guides a few years ago.

He’s the 1st one I used: https://youtu.be/4mySqL4bCSw

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 days ago

networking is already a higher hurdle IMO

[–] Lfrith@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

If you've installed fresh Windows off a usb then process is the same for Linux, and you don't really need to mess with terminal by just using the Microsoft Store equivalent on the Linux distro you choose. I didn't find it too different from using Windows or MacOS. I was able to download all my usual programs like Steam and Firefox off the Linux appstore.

But if I had to install a program outside of the Linux store they usually came as a sh or deb file.

If it was deb I'd open terminal where the deb file was and type in sudo dpkg -i filename.deb

And if sh I'd open terminal where the sh file was and type in sh ./name_of_file.sh

That's pretty much the only terminal commands I've needed to know to get started.

When it came to drivers I was lucky enough to have it be pretty much handle everything for me on my old laptop out the box. Main reason I had tried Linux was because Windows ran slow on it, and also an old scanner I had didn't have drivers that supported it anymore. But, on Linux the scanner just worked.

[–] bufalo1973@lemm.ee 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

And in some desktops you can click on the deb file and it asks you if you want to install it.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It isn't, really. As @CosmicTurtle0 pointed out in their response, it's mostly finding alternatives to your apps.

Apropos: fuck mozilla for enshittifying the last viable open source browser alternative :( It's the one I have not found an alternative for yet.

Other than that: Thunderbird is WAY better than Outlook anyways. Gimp is arguably lacking some features that Photoshop people are used to, but works just fine (albeit takes some getting used to) for non graphic designers. LibreOffice is functioning better than Microsoft Office by a long shot in Writer and Calc - and up to par in Impress (presentations.) VLC should already be your media player of choice anyways. Element (Matrix) and Telegram desktop applications come with most distros nowadays. Desktop environment of choice is available, from very comfortable to very rudimentary and blazingly fast.

Steam works, many many games on steam work (but then again, maybe prefer gog / good old games, as it is not US based).

PDF readers: okular is probably your best bet, digital signatures work fine but the interface for signing a document could be improved a bit.

For my system, that's kind of it - everything else is native Linux stuff anyways :)

[–] azalty@jlai.lu 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I know. But better than using products from fascists...

[–] neatobuilds@lemmy.today 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The hardest part is picking a username and seeing what the name of the app store is on the distro

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

please don't call it app store, I just threw up a little in my mouth :(

Package Manager!

[–] neatobuilds@lemmy.today 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

We have to be hip and shorten it, so like maybe instead of package manager it can be pacman or if maybe by distro so like the popos can have a pop shop

pacman is the name of an actual package manager iirc

Successful propaganda. As if those people were able to install (or configure) Windows if it didn't come preinstalled and with autoupdates...

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

How about this: I'll offer installation support and free tech support for three months to the first 20 people that ask. Free of charge. I only have three conditions:

  1. You pick from a handful of distros I'm willing to support - Debian, Fedora, openSUSE Leap
  2. You donate any amount of money to any FOSS project or contribute something to a FOSS project
  3. I reserve the right to not help get certain Windows software working, like anything Adobe
[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Caveat number 3 is the reason I'm still on windows, I take it that's still not an option then.

Maybe it is, idk, but if it works it'll be a pain. If people are willing to switch software, I'm willing to help them.

[–] Grangle1@lemm.ee 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I think the biggest factor in that is getting tutorials and such out there that focus on the basics, written by people who mainly do things on Linux using the basics and GUI tools. So much of the Linux content out there is focused on power users and even the tutorials for new users tend to be written by those power users who may have been tech focused before switching and forget or just don't know how basic they really have to get to not make people feel intimidated. Given the right distro/desktop environment, and there's plenty of good ones to start with, people can use Linux almost just how they use Windows. They just need someone to show them how without pushing them to do everything in the terminal too fast or going immediately to scripting as a solution to problems.

[–] Condiment2085@lemm.ee 3 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Exactly. I'm really interested in running Linux but it would be more of something interesting to try when I have time rather than an actual OS change.

The biggest issue for me is I'm a photographer and I depend on Adobe Lightroom, Photoshop, etc. I know there are open source alternatives, but from what I've seen they are far behind adobe.

[–] Vittelius@feddit.org 2 points 5 days ago

All the open source alternatives also work on windows. You could try them on your current OS and make the switch to Linux once you're confident you've found a workflow that works for you.

Lightroom: Darktable Photoshop: Gimp (version 3 just released) or Krita Illustrator: Inkscape

One note though: The Windows versions tend to be a bit of an afterthought. Performance can therefore be not as good as the Linux version.

[–] azalty@jlai.lu 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I guess dual boot could be a solution :)

[–] Condiment2085@lemm.ee 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Ooo I didn't know about this I shall look into it.

Could you do it on Windows?

[–] azalty@jlai.lu 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Haven't done it myself yet! I'm planning to switch to Linux Mint later this year, and have a dual boot with Windows on the side, so I can switch at any time if needed.

I think it has a built-in dual boot feature: img

I advise backing up your harddrive and stuff to prevent problems, or having one for Windows and the other one for Linux so you avoid problems. Credits here: https://opensource.com/article/18/5/dual-boot-linux#Ubuntu

I have no experience with this yet, always double verify! I think Mint uses GRUB

Arch linux also has a more in depth post on this

[–] Norin@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I have to wonder what the October end of life for Windows 10 will bring in that regard.

Computers are expensive. Some people will buy something new, others won’t be able. That crowd has 2 options of finding a new OS or using one that’s no longer supported.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 14 points 5 days ago

Most people will just continue using an out of date operating system because they don't understand the security risks. It happens every time MS ends support of an OS line.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I think you are wildly underestimating the people who will say fuck it and keep rolling with 10. For that matter, how about the people who don't even realize it's EOL? Sure, they'll get warnings, which they'll promptly ignore.

[–] veniasilente@lemm.ee 3 points 5 days ago

I have some people at a client's still happily using 8.1 (but hey, at least they're not using 7!).

And, to be frank, if they had to stay on Windows I'd prefer they stay on 8.1 anyway. What with 10 requiring the online accounts or adding start menu adds or removing the interfaces of the Control Panel and everything else.

[–] jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 5 points 6 days ago

Time to start selling thigh-high programming socks then.