this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2025
294 points (96.8% liked)

Fuck Cars

11073 readers
111 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

According to the U.S. Department of Transportation, approximately one-third of the nation’s residents don’t have driver’s licenses. In her 2024 book “When Driving is Not an Option: Steering Away from Car Dependency,” disability advocate Anna Zivarts argues that not only is America’s car-centric infrastructure harmful to the climate, it also fails to meet the everyday needs of many Americans.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca -2 points 3 days ago (3 children)

You mean like New York where everywhere is clogged with taxis? Rather than people driving themselves, somebody else is.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Taxis are immensely more efficient space wise than individual people owning cars.

The average car is parked 97% of the time. If we took taxis away from NYC and didn’t compensate with public transport , they’d probably have to replace central park with a massive parking lot. Not kidding.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

They are, my only point was no drivers license doesn't equal not traveling by car

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think this perception is a little inversed or skewed IMO. The congestion is caused by individual cars which block the transit and taxi routes.

The Transit is needed, otherwise more cars need to be added to the road. With increased transite, more cars are removed from the road.

From what I have seen based on the congestion charges implemented in NYC as a example, it's dropped the number of personal vehicles commuting into the city at any given day. This in turn has dropped the congestion, while in turn dropping taxi commuting times.

Things like congestion charges are a artificial incentive to carpool, take transit, or split the cost of a cab. This decreases the amount of cars while keeping the amount of commuters roughly the same.

Now you could argue with more of the road now "open" or "free", what stops more taxis from being added to take advantage of a increase in demand for quicker travel.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago

Of course transit is needed. I prefer it. I was only commenting on why we are still carcentric even if people don't have drivers licenses, people still use uber and taxis (car centric) instead of a bus or subway. Either routes and service are not enough, or people are uses to immediate needs serviced and don't want to wait at a busstop

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

New York is more than like midtown manhattan. I would not describe it as "clogged with taxis".

Also there's like 3.5 million subway riders per day in NYC.

So I don't know what point you're trying to make.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca -4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The article of "1/3 people don't have drivers licenses so why are we so car centric". People still use cars (as taxis) without a drivers license. Having no license does not mean you solely rely on transit.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm pretty confident that most people moving around NYC are not taking a taxi on the daily. I'm guessing you don't live here.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca -1 points 3 days ago

You missed the point of what I was meaning. The article was eluding to people without licenses should mean leas reliance on cars. But Uber exists, taxis exist, car pool exist. Just because a person doesn't have a license does not equal not traveling by car.