this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2025
1328 points (98.6% liked)

Fuck Cars

11286 readers
310 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

original post: https://feddit.org/post/10733288

Source: stux@mstdn.social

"This is why we don't need #US #cars in #Europe"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 284 points 5 days ago (3 children)

“This is why we don’t need #US #cars in #Europe”

We don't need this shit in the US, either. I hope that tram just rammed the fucker.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 169 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I hope the city seized the truck, auctioned it off, and fined the owner for littering.

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 60 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (4 children)

In Estonia, at your second ~~speeding~~ drunk-driving violation they confiscate your vehicle - and if it's an SUV they send it to Ukraine.

For backstory, see latest episode of the podcast The Urbanist Agenda.

[–] huppakee@lemm.ee 15 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I heard this was if you get caught for drunk driving the second time, they stepped up their game damn.

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You're right, I meant drunk driving, not speeding.

But some countries take speeding pretty seriously too (as they should). In Norway you get a short jail spell for something like a 30kmh excess. In Switzerland the fines are adjusted for income so that rich speeders pay more - one guy paid over €1 million! Same system in Finland too, I believe.

[–] huppakee@lemm.ee 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Speeding and drink driving play a big part in traffic deaths and also the cost of fixing all the people who do survive is totally preventable so I am all for it. Progressive fines sound very fair too, misbehaving companies in some cases also pay a percentage of their profit so why not citizens as well.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

My wealthy ex’s family would just pay the tickets, so he never learned.

I’d beg him not to go 40 in school zones.

[–] huppakee@lemm.ee 2 points 4 days ago

Could be that their wealth caused them not to care about fines, if they had to pay 5% of that wealth every time they would definity take it easy in school zones.

[–] Faresh@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Don't you get deducted points for speeding? Like after a while wouldn't he lose his license, regardless of how much he pays?

[–] dankm@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago

Where I live you only get deducted points for some kinds of speeding. Speeding in a school zone or residential street? Lose points. Excessive speeding? Lose points. Going 120kph in a 110kph zone on the highway between cities? Smallish fine and be on your way.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Clarification: titled "Let's Send our Pickup Trucks to Ukraine (with Build the Lanes)"

https://podcastaddict.com/the-urbanist-agenda/episode/196176727

Since, y'know... in a few weeks it won't be the latest one anymore.

[–] white_nrdy@programming.dev 5 points 5 days ago

This was a great episode, and was great to hear this way to use trucks....

Thank you for the podcast tip, I'd like to learn more about what you described!

[–] Liz@midwest.social 39 points 5 days ago (2 children)

More like melted it down for scrap

[–] jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 31 points 5 days ago

and turned it into a new tram (because it's almost the same size as the fkn tram)

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I don't think we necessarily need to melt down the owner...

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I hope too. But because the news headline would be "Dodge Rammed"

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Driver comes running over to move the car just in time… “Ram Dodged”

[–] griff@lemmings.world 3 points 5 days ago

The Most Holy Ram Dodge

[–] techt@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I know we're being hyperbolic here but hard disagree -- how awful would that be for everyone on-board? And absolutely not worth the damage to public infrastructure. There's an established procedure for dealing with blockages, and I hope that process irreparably damages the truck and results in a hefty fine for the owner

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Not great for adjacent vehicles either

[–] techt@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago

Yeah exactly. Even in jest I loathe this unquestioned impulse to punish the offender without any thought to collateral. This driver's primary offense is being oblivious to their impact on others -- what message is sent if the reaction is just as oblivious?

Okay I'm done policing morals.