this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2025
893 points (99.2% liked)

News

36000 readers
2484 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"I think it's really scary this is going on," said Nicole Micheroni. "I think it says they're not being careful."

When Massachusetts resident Nicole Micheroni received an email on Friday from the federal government telling her to leave the country, she was baffled.

"At first I thought it was for a client, but I looked really closely and the only name on the email was mine," said Micheroni. "So it said my parole status had been terminated and I should leave the country within seven days."

But the 40-year-old is a U.S. citizen, born in Newton and raised in Sharon.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 215 points 10 months ago (6 children)

"Micheroni says she won't be reaching out to Homeland Security, and figures this is an administrative error.

She hopes nothing more comes of it."

I'm surprised she's being so sedate about this, I'd get it in front of a judge immediately to establish a paper trail.

It would also be good to find out who else they are doing this to.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 76 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Considering they already have accidentally sent somebody to an El Salvador torture prison and are ignoring a court order to even attempt to bring them back... Yeah she should really be raising hell over this.

[–] TripleIris@lemmy.wtf 21 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago
[–] And009@lemmynsfw.com 24 points 10 months ago

55% people do be like that

[–] dutchkimble@lemy.lol 12 points 10 months ago

Yeah, when I read that bit I thought that’s quite unlike what usually someone who is an expert in this exact field would do

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 10 points 10 months ago

She's offering them the "benefit of the doubt," to let them correct their error. Unfortunately, the general response to mistakes is to double down on their stupidity.

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

She's a lawyer she knows her rights.

If they come for her it will be fully documented and she can actually do something.

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago (1 children)

She'll be kidnapped and sent to El Salvador before she can do anything. There is no law.

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That only happens to people who have nobody to speak for them, that's why immigrants are so vulnerable.

She'll have armies of lawyers covering her.

This is Rosa Parks for white lawyers who want to feel like they're doing something, good on her.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Nah, dude. The president has directly attacked law firms that have opposed him with bills of attainder via EOs. The president has directly, flagrantly, and openly flaunted court orders. The DOJ initially said deporting Kilmar was an accident; today, Miller clarified it was not an accident at all. They shouldn't have been able to put a man in prison indefinitely without due process, but they have. They shouldn't be able to lie to and ignore the courts, but they are. I am begging you to understand that the rules no longer apply, we are in a dictatorship and nobody is coming to save us. We must save ourselves.

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's money.

When you threaten a lawyers actual freedom, that's when shit gets really real.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

No. Lawyers are lower case m money. They work for the upper case M money, which is who the Trump administration is bowing to. They aren't worried about lower case money, especially because the courts have shown themselves to be utterly toothless. I'm telling you, the administration is already chilling lawyers by targeting firms directly with EOs, and it's working. The lawyers are not going to save us. They're going to be standing on the sidelines with the judges yelling "but you can't do that, the rules say so!" As the Trump administration goes ahead and does it. I know because that's what happening right now.

[–] CalipherJones@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I mean, realistically what are her options?

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What would the legal basis of the lawsuit be? What relief would she be seeking?

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They are threatening a US citizen with deportation. At a minimum, she should be suing to vacate the deportation order.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Is there a deportation order? If she has that, she should show it. AFAIK she just has an email now.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

The idea would be to block it before it reaches the point of a deportation order.

https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/trump-wants-deport-some-us-citizens-el-salvador-2025-04-14/