this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2023
1699 points (94.0% liked)

Technology

59377 readers
5843 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Youtube let the other shoe drop in their end-stage enshittification this week. Last month, they required you to turn on Youtube History to view the feed of youtube videos recommendations. That seems reasonable, so I did it. But I delete my history every 1 week instead of every 3 months. So they don't get much from my choices. It still did a pretty good job of showing me stuff I was interested in watching.

Then on Oct 1, they threw up a "You're using an Ad Blocker" overlay on videos. I'd use my trusty Overlay Remover plugin to remove the annoying javascript graphic and watch what I wanted. I didn't have to click the X to dismiss the obnoxious page.

Last week, they started placing a timer with the X so you had to wait 5 seconds for the X to appear so you could dismiss blocking graphic.

Today, there was a new graphic. It allowed you to view three videos before you had to turn off your Ad Blocker. I viewed a video 3 times just to see what happens.

Now all I see is this.

Google has out and out made it a violation of their ToS to have an ad blocker to view Youtube. Or you can pay them $$$.

I ban such sites from my systems by replacing their DNS name in my hosts file routed to 127.0.0.1 which means I can't view the site. I have quite a few banned sites now.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The ignorance is loud in this post.

These arent teenagers. These people are paying mortgages and buying food for their children. And you call it a choice. What's the other option? Because if you say Twitch (literally the only option), no. Twitch isn't fantastic either, and also has ads, and only last year dropped their creator revenue from 70% to a 50/50 split!

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

SELF HOSTING.

You're either brainwashed by people who wanna incorporate you into their money cycle, or just plain don't understand how the Internet actually functions. Nobody needs YouTube in the middle and nobody should make the decision to be at the mercy of a commander of the sheep army. You all appoint YouTube as your overlord when that big crowd gets you all thirsty.

[–] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Sorry bud. Self hosting thousands of 3+ hour long HD game stream videos just isn't practical or feasible for the average person. Paying 15$ to YouTube to do this for me without showing me ads is hardly "appointing an overlord".

Edit: and have you seen self hosted video services? Because they aren't anything new, YouTube networks have been hosting their own content for nearly a decade now your idea isn't original. The rooster teeth website is trash. And frankly, the idea of juggling 10 plus of these websites all each with their own subscription models for the creators I want to support seems like a total nightmare.

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If your audience is paying you via sponsor or patreon enough for you to do the work, what's unfeasible about paying for hosting? Patreon does plenty good for handling subscriptions and the view model is easily taken care of by Grayjay. https://odysee.com/@rossmanngroup:a/the-best-way-to-watch-online-video-my:c?r=FV2rjf5wj3s7pPm2ngr9ice2mvCtT4S3

Sorry bud yourself.

[–] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm not talking about creators even, I'm talking about as a consumer for all the artists you want to support. It's just not feasible for most people's income to financially support 20 plus individuals (i personally subscribe to over 30 channels!) Pal.

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You really gotta look at server hosting prices. I have a friend who straight up runs a video server from his house and has crazy numbers of people streaming. Server hosting is cheeaaap.

[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How about a real job like the rest of us miserable peasants.

[–] EatMyPixelDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

What's your definition of a "real job"? Do you think content creators just make videos without any effort?

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Who cares about their effort? I put in effort to get my cross hair over dude's heads in videogames and I don't expect a dollar for it. I expect dollars for being part of making Ford truck transmissions. If you all weren't expecting your hobby to pay you, the rest of us might actually have some time and resources to be doing that shit for fun that you all expect to be paid for.