this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
75 points (87.9% liked)
196
3158 readers
1689 users here now
Community Rules
You must post before you leave
Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).
Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.
Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.
Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".
Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.
Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.
Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.
Avoid AI generated content.
Avoid misinformation.
Avoid incomprehensible posts.
No threats or personal attacks.
No spam.
Moderator Guidelines
Moderator Guidelines
- Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
- Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
- When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
- Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
- Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
- Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
- Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
- Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
- Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
- Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
- Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
- Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
- First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
- Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
- No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
- Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
- Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.
founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
It could be better yes, but most right wing parties are doing rather well because of old (read dying) people, while young people are overwhelmingly leftist.
I disagree heavily with this. That's mostly a thing pushed by tankies, the ones we argue with. But then arguing with tankies isn't productive either, it is a distraction at best.
What exactly do you propose if not outreach? You seem to criticize the idea of spreading awareness in general. Did you read the parts where I also said the same stuff about what you call information gatekeepers? I should note I am also heavily in favor of direct action and unionization, but doing those things also requires outreach. I think really the best thing to do is irl word of mouth, irl political participation, and establishing good leftist spaces online (without tankies).
It's not just tankies, beyond Lemmie's specific local rift.
It's left leaning liberals with social democrats, social democrats with gramscian leftists, gramscian leftists and classic marxists, all of the above with tankies, or with whatever cosplay anarchists dwell in places like these. And much more, depending on the local political landscape.
Neofascists don't even feel the need to agree with themselves, they'll argue one thing and the opposite as long as they get to stir some stuff up online, "own the libs" and win some arguments. There is nowhere near that level of propaganda discipline and willingness to row in the same direction at any point of the left. They broke feminism in two (three or four, really, but a few of those chickens are still to get home) with the slightest of propaganda pressure. They didn't even need that much to make most left and center-left political coalitions crumble. At this point I assume they're trying to be gentle when making frustrated leftists stay home in elections because there's no challenge in it.
My proposal? Take a page from their book. Prioritize wining arguments and mobilizing over practical policy, get to the policy once you've consolidated power. Complain that you're not allowed to deploy the full policy because of the other guys and the establishment all the way up. Never disagree with anybody willing to agree with you on anything. Never agree with a political rival. Never own the failures of the system. Find a scapegoat that works and push it.
None of those things are ideological. But nobody on the left will suspend their purity tests to play in the playground we've built for ourselves.
I'm all for dismantling that playground. It's toxic and grotesque. But you won't do that with "outreach" and "spreading awareness". You do that with hard, consolidated institutional power. They know. The left doesn't.
Me oh my. Yeah no there are other ways than "consolidating power" and lying to people. You can engage people emotionally without being manipulative and still push good policies.
Also, that all sounds very US centric and honestly a bit wrong. It is usually the libs that deplatform and refuse to cooperate with socialists. That's certainly the case within the democratic party. Same here in norway, with liberals not working with socialists (and rather the populists instead), and with the soc dems only ever reluctantly cooperating with us. It was announced, to my joy, a few days ago that LO (a big union) will finally give some money to the red party (a socialist party) because the reds getting enough votes is the only way the social democrats will win.
Edit: This is also my general understanding of politics everywhere. That centrists and right wingers (libs) have no interest in working with anyone left of them. It's certainly how fascists have won elections all around the world.
I'm not in the US, let's start there. I am in a territory that is generally left-leaning and has a left-leaning government, let's set that next.
And no, there are no other ways than consolidating power because a leftist without a government position is not useful to me at all. A leftist without a seat does not push good policies. They don't push any policies at all. Governments push policies. The only leftists who push good policies are in government.
There is no need to lie to be engaging, but you do need to convince people. You need to present arguments and you need to win those arguments in the eyes of the people. You need to show the alternatives are doing poorly and create an image that they are incompetent and the cause of the current set of issues. Which should be easy, because they are, by and large.
But that's not being done. The perception is that the left is deluded, splintered and naive. Those are all perceptions pushed by the right onto the left that the left sucks at dispelling. The implication in your response that popular, effective campaigning and grassroots political action is inherently immoral or requires immoral behavior is itself part of that problem. Hell, we are doing the thing right now. If we were on the fascist spectrum we wouldn't bother with this nitpicky argument and would just wait for whatever point of contention we can agree on and rally around it. We just suck at this.
Look, it's ultimately a technical problem. The other side saw the communication tools had a flaw and exploited it. Not because they're smart, but because they had a million monkeys on typewriters tucked away online and they randomly figured out they could influence real world events for a laugh. And then the nazis caught wind.
We missed that boat and then bought into their narrative that this was something they own that is evil and only they get to do, and so we're laying out a red carpet for them to own mainstream culture. It's excurciating to watch.
Well yeah. This we agree on, but it really did not sound like this is what you meant by what you wrote earlier.
No? You read me wrong then.
You were pushing this earlier on in the convo
Yeah, no, we suck at this, like I said.
This conversation is not winning the culture wars. This is the exact purity argument that keeps the left from power.
Find me a solution and I'll take it. But the solution can't be to keep doing what we're doing.
This convo isn't infighting, even if it isn't very productive. Neither of us are denouncing any leftist ideologies and we won't be voting against the left if I'm reading you correctly.
You are correct that something needs to change, and that thing is how we communicate with people. Deceit isn't necessary. It's the things you described that I had already described earlier that you for some reason then said was ineffectual before then suddenly supporting it when you were the one saying it?
I'm not sure I follow.
My concern is consistent: the way the left communicates, does propaganda and pushes issues is weak, fails to control the narrative and is further undermined by atomized, nuanced positions and infighting.
The right has learned to push a more cohesive narrative in a social media landscape, largely by allowing themselves to be inconsistent and focusing on winning small arguments at every opportunity until one sticks, at which point they all rally behind it.
The left sucks at that. Nobody will suspend their pet issues, nobody will poke at the mainstream to see what works, nobody will drop their short term goals to focus on the popular narratives for the chance of deploying impactful politics on those goals later.
I find this negligent in the current political landscape, and it's letting the far right run away with converting dissatisfaction into votes, even on issues where the left clearly has the strongest argument.
You really seem to think that the left just needs to win and is skill issue failing by not being strong enough. As an American who is currently living with the consequences of thinking "we just need to get good and vote better," pursuing that strategy is a dead end.
The right wing wins because that is its ONLY goal. You will always be at a disadvantage because of natural human disagreements that you can NEVER get rid of. You can't beat them at their game because they have fully surrendered themselves to WINNING, WINNING, and more WINNING.
It's clear that you'll never accept this fact, because it's much more convenient to think you can just work harder.
Well, as a not-American whose left wing actually secured a government, you are wrong. Winning is the ONLY goal, because when you win you get to do things and when you lose you do not get to do things. And if you're not doing things you're just talking online and I genuinely have less depressing stuff to discuss online if that's the only goal.
I also fail to see how finding that we need to work harder is convenient. From where I stand it's a pain in the butt.
I have taken many things from US cultural imperialism, good and bad. I am not taking cushy leftie defeatism the-system-won't-let us nonsense. Every American I've met is simultaneously convinced that any change or victory is impossible and also that the revolution will be immediate and violent.
Screw all that noise. The left wins when it deploys a winning strategy and engages in politics to secure more power than it loses over time.
Yeah, I get that. A big issue in America that makes leftism seem so impossible is just how tied up anti-leftist sentiment is with American national identity. Capitalism and a hatred of marxism is ancient, with most of the most powerful unions of the progressive era being staunchly anti-communist. It is illusory, as it is innately tied to our imperial identity, which is why dismantling it in the American psyche is so important.
For the record, I was fairly invested in promoting institutional power until recently, holding onto the fleeting hope that liberals would be willing to work at all to save their own system, and leftists would wise up and use what tools they had available. Now that America as a nation is irrevocably toast, I hope to weaken the tribal identity. I only seek to use the tools I have available, and national institutions are not one of them.
However, my real goal is simply survival. I can't get rid of Trump, so I only have to outlive them.
Here's a party doing exactly what you suggest. Notice how the party isn't exactly soaring in the statistics and is disliked by leftists as a result of all the bigotry.
No, see, there's a difference between being good at using communication tools and being a bigot. That is part of the left's issue, too. The goal isn't to scapegoat the same people the right does, that typically does not work. The idea is to scapegoat the same people that are already being targeted (right wing politicians, large corporations, billionaires) effectively.
You keep using the word scapegoat ? I find the way you speak rather iffy in general
Aha. And that's the left putting the aesthetics of progressivism over the ethics and the politics of progressivisim.
Again, I only care about talking like the good guys talk insofar it gets the good guys a position of political power. Not because we say the right things or we feel the right things or we have a consistent, morally homogeneous maximalist approach to improving the world, but because a butt in a chair can make the world marginally better for the rest.
I'd be more lenient and mushy about that if we weren't in the process of the second rise of fascism. We're kind of in panic mode now.
Scapegoating implies being deceitful. It's not about aesthetics.
It is if the scapegoat is a rich guy without much actual influence but a flashy car. It is if it's some rich weirdo's kinks being paraded to make the moneyed class appear unethical or morally deranged.
Think about how bad one has to be at this to have lost the public argument regarding marginalized trans people being a moral risk while Trump and the British royalty were engaged in the whole Epstein fiasco. And that's before the whole "lost in court to his pornstar lover" stuff went down.
And they still won, rallied religious leaders around them, won again and successfully convinced the populace that queer people will attack their kids in school.
It is political negligence of the highest order.
No, they just have more means and control the media. But again, your language use is bad. Scapegoating is inherently a word that describes a form of deceit.
Yeah.
Hey, guess what? Trump isn't bad because he has a mushroom for a penis and had extramarital sex.
And no, they don't have more means or control the media more than antivaxxers did. Or QAnon did. How did the fascists leverage those things into political support through social media and fringe publications but the left can't get actual, legtimate issues to take the spotlight?
It's not "being suppressed". Let's have a modicum of self-criticism. Take some responsibility at all. At some point. Please.
You won't be convincing anyone like this
Well, no, but it's hard to watch it all circle down the drain and not say anything.
Which is, I suppose, the underlying problem.
I'm still right, though.
lol