this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
410 points (95.0% liked)

Comic Strips

16456 readers
3285 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] anachrohack@lemmy.world 29 points 21 hours ago (2 children)
[–] sundray@lemmus.org 93 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

"The Stanford marshmallow experiment was a study on delayed gratification in 1970 led by psychologist Walter Mischel, a professor at Stanford University.[1] In this study, a child was offered a choice between one small but immediate reward, or two small rewards if they waited for a period of time."

The joke is that in this version of the experiment, the child isn't being tested, the marshmallow is. And in this case, the marshmallow has decided to eat this one child instead of waiting until later, when it would have been allowed to eat two children.

[–] anachrohack@lemmy.world 106 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Oh shit, I totally didn't see that the marshmallow was biting the kid. The image is so small it looked like a power outlet behind him on the wall

[–] Acamon@lemmy.world 25 points 20 hours ago

Same, was confused until I zoomed in.

[–] riquisimo@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago

Same! Man this really needs an edit where the marshmallow is biting from there opposite side of his arm.

[–] xorollo@leminal.space 20 points 20 hours ago

Thanks. I didn't see the marshmallow chewing on the kids arm till I read this then zoomed in. Lol

[–] i_love_FFT@jlai.lu 20 points 21 hours ago (5 children)

I always found this study to be lacking...

5 minutes is not worth 1 marshmallow. Marshmallows are not that good, so one is way enough. As a kid, I could never trust adults who wanted to limit good things. Who's to say the strange adult in a white coat would really bring a 2nd marshmallow? What if they actually remove the marshmallow instead?

In short, it can only separate kids in two groups: the blind followers of authority and the other ones.

[–] TheFlopster@lemmy.world 22 points 20 hours ago

This is what I've said since I learned of this experiment. I'm only waiting for the second marshmallow if BOTH of the following statements are true:

  1. I want two marshmallows.

  2. I trust the adult to keep his word.

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 10 points 18 hours ago

As a kid, I could never trust adults who wanted to limit good things.

Guess what? This effect has been found in other experiments!

The marshmallow experiment is one of those that self-help gurus and LinkedIn 'influencers' love to peddle as being meaningful, in no small part because it tells people who had lucky upbringings that they are inherently better than others, and not just a product of their environment. But when it's actually examined critically, it falls apart.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 16 hours ago

Time to calculate how much 1 marshmallow is worth in time considering minimum wage in my country.

Let's begin.
Minimum wage in Slovakia is €4.69/h.
An 80g bag of Jojo marshmallows is €1.19 at Tesco.
It claims one portion is 3 marshmallows which is 11.7g.
Therefore 1 marshmallow is 3.9g.
Therefore there are 20 - 21 marshmallows in the bag.
Therefore 1 marshmallow costs roughly €0.058.
€4.69/h is €0.078/m or €0.0013/s.
Therefore, 1 marshmallow costs roughly 44.62 seconds of work time.

Well, assuming there are no taxes. So maybe something close to 1 minute per marshmallow. Although... maybe if we add total time, including time you're not working... 12 marshmallows an hour, 288 a day, 2016 a week, 8640 a month. That's €501.12/month.

Based on this the minimum monthly wage after taxes and all is €661.80/month.

Conclusion: It is worth the 5 minutes.

[–] riquisimo@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

They should have done cookies instead.

And sweeten the deal. 1 cookie or a BAG.. Yeah, give me a BAG it cookies, yeah. I'm an ADULT.

[–] WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com 2 points 21 hours ago

Marshmallows are bad. 2 would be a punishment.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

We did this in church with maltesars

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Way better than marshmallows!

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I think we were also given 3. We were given one at the start of the small sunday school class, and if we had it at the end of it, we were given three more. So the difference was that if you ate it early, you still would have had to wait anyway.

[–] Genius@lemmy.zip 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Won't it melt from the heat in your hand/pocket? I ain't having chocolate stains in my pocket, I'm eating it now.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 2 points 3 hours ago

It was sitting on the table

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] anachrohack@lemmy.world 16 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

I know what the marshmallow test is; I don't get the joke in the comic. It depicts one of the kids who didn't wait. Where's the joke?

[–] 5too@lemmy.world 10 points 21 hours ago

It's not the kid who didn't wait...

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 6 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I think it's that he waited 5 seconds and got zero marshmellows?

Or he ate it already between the 2nd and 3rd panel, and is demanding the second one?

[–] dmention7@lemm.ee 8 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I didn't get it til another poster pointed it out -- instead of the kid eating the marshmallow, the marshmallow is biting the kid's arm.

I glanced over the comic a couple times, and each time I saw the kid tossing the marshmallow in the air as if to catch it in his mouth.

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 2 points 20 hours ago
[–] Nighed@feddit.uk 5 points 21 hours ago

The marshmallow is eating the kid, not the other way round.