this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
709 points (98.9% liked)
Technology
70031 readers
4982 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Cool. I mean I haven't been able to get past a single 10-minute "I just want to go over the job with you and collect some basic information" phone interview in 6-months.
But ya know. Another 6,000 people on the market is cool too.
I'm right there with you. A few years ago, if I got one interview I was guaranteed to be in round 3 or 4. Now, I'm lucky to get the intro call and then "we'll be in touch". If anything, my skillset is improved from a few years ago.
You aren't alone, many people from former companies I used to work with are reporting the same thing. Unless you have a buddy at a company that can get you in, people aren't finding seats nearly as easily as they used to. I'm saddened but I don't see an end to this anytime soon. To be honest, I wish I had chosen a different career, as I feel slightly held hostage now.
I've been saying for years the corporate world was getting ready to pull the rug from tech workers. Why do people think educational standards (and as it goes, engineering standards) for software development have been pushed down so much over the last decade? "What if you get hit by a bus??" A well strangely well backed movement to "stop gatekeeping" software development now revealed as a trojan horse to make developers fungible.
Well it might take 2TB of RAM for this buggy prod system to store and retrieve a JSON blob but at least anyone can work on it.
I keep hoping this will spark some sort of anti-capitalist zeitgeist. But labor might be too scattered and individualistic.
Like, why are we all scrambling for a handful of jobs when the rich have so many resources?
I mean, what would that even look like? New "software communes" getting founded? I don't necessarily disagree with you, but I'm curious what that would actually look like on the ground.
At the very least form unions. That will help with stuff like wage theft, some people getting underpaid, BS firings, etc.
More aggressively, maybe some sort of collective ownership. Not this "options" bullshit where they never even vest for most people. The whole thing where management pays you $100 and sells what you made for $3000 needs to go. That $3000 needs to be more fairly shared among the people that made it happen.
But I don't really know. I'm just some guy with entry level knowledge and a sense that the current system is wrong.
"But that's communism!"
Because have fun doing anything about it while scrambling to survive
Oh fuck off with this 'survive' nonsense.
Literally every bitch I know in America complaining about "not having enough money" spends it like a goddamn idiot.
Doordash every day. Subscriptions out the wah-zoo for things they can be getting for free.
You'd better believe most of them are going to be buying a switch 2 instead of emulating.
Oh, and the thought of moving somewhere cheaper? Forget about it. It's "not good enough" for them.
No, they get no sympathy from me. They all deserve what's coming to them and I hope it hits hard.
It kinda sounds like you're shaming people simply for spending their money on entertainment, food or better living conditions. That kind of take can come off like saying, "you’re poor, so you don’t deserve to enjoy anything."
I get that there are alternatives like pirating, but that doesn't really solve the bigger issue: we shouldn't have to resort to that in the first place.
I'll shame someone for using door dash. No able bodied person deserves servants to both cook for them and deliver hot food to them from across town. That is an incredible privilege that should be reserved for those truly in need or as an expense luxury.
No, it's not "all or nothing." You people keep pretending that's what I'm arguing for because you don't want to acknowledge your own contribution to the problem. The person I was replying was trying to argue 'survival,' and now here you are moving the goalposts to 'wants.'
They keep conflating needs with wants, so whoever takes their wants away is immediately a bad person.
They don't need more money. As soon as they get more, they're going to spend more on more dumb shit while there are still starving children on the planet.
It does if enough people do it.
Correct, but we don't live in a perfect world.
You make some good points and I see where you're coming from, but I think that person used the term "survive" figuratively. Even so, when you say the world is not perfect you're kind of oversimplifying the situation by making it seem like things are the way they are because of some unfortunate event no one can control, when in reality things are designed to be harder for people with less money, and I'll try to use your own examples to show that.
Streaming: Remember when we only had Netflix and it had a full extensive catalog, no ads and was much more affordable? Then studios started splitting content just to make more profit, and now every year we pay more to get less content. Even basic plans with ads are going up. You mentioned pirating, but that’s not exactly easy or accessible for everyone, not to mention it’s a legal gray area (which is another discussion on its own).
Delivery: Sure, no one needs to order takeout, but even cooking at home is getting expensive, especially if you want to eat healthy. If you’re trying to save money you basically have to buy stuff loaded with sugar and fat or use shit ingredients, it's like they're trying to slowly kill us.
Living: let's not pretend there's not a housing crisis going on for a while, where people with money are buying up everything just to rent it back out to other people with money. Meanwhile everyone else is getting pushed to unsafe areas with poor living conditions.
(Also, just saying, that whole "fuck you" attitude of yours doesn’t really help with anything.)
Yes, but even then I never subscribed to netflix because free streaming sites had more content for free. They still do. You really have no idea how disconnected you are from people who legitimately need more money and scrutinize everything they spend it on. It's called privilege.
Wait... what? You're saying it's getting expensive to cook at home, so the solution is to spend more money on delivery? Is this satire?
What the fuck? Are you seriously suggesting that it's better to get doordash because eating at home is "too expensive and unhealthy"?
That's because people have been conditioned to rent instead of own. Most of the people complaining about housing are living above their means and think they deserve more before people who have less. For example, I guarantee most of the people on these forums complains about not having enough money while spending $1,000+/month on rent in a major city.
They could live more modest lives in more rural areas, but "that's not good enough for them." Saying "there are no jobs" is a load of bullshit and I guarantee none of them are talking from experience.
I'm holding people accountable for their contributions to the problem. They want to consume guilt-free and get mad at anyone who calls it out.
I don't expect them to change no matter what. It would take an act of god to beat the consumerism out of this generation.
Living in a rural area for many people is literal hell, on top of having an array of less obvious costs. The big one is going from not needing a car to needing one. Your rent might drop $500 but you need to spend a lot on gas, insurance, maintenance, etc.
Also the social options might fall off a cliff. Humans are social creatures. I live in a city and I can walk to dozens of social activities, many of them free. Board game meetups, free music in the park, free museums with tours, free sport leagues, etc. Out in the countryside there just aren't as many options.
If you're queer or another minority, you might also have a worse time in the countryside. Maybe even fatally. A city is going to have a queer scene.
Also, there are likely more jobs in the city. Remote work and economic upheaval have changed things, but even so, most of those offices in Manhattan are full of jobs. There's just more stuff where there's more people.
Now, to your point, some people are certainly living in a $5900/mo apartment with a doorman and in-building gym that they can't afford. They could move to a less "nice" place in south Brooklyn or Queens for less than half that, likely at the cost of a longer commute, and losing easy access to a neighborhood they feel a part of. There is a housing crisis though, and people are getting priced further away. That's probably not going to be solved any time soon because capitalism doesn't care and will happily eat itself.
Anyway. Long tangent but I'm extremely pro city so I spoke up.
Stopped reading after that. You're trying to defend entitlement.
Well, if you want to have a conversation go ahead and read the rest of the post. Otherwise you're just kind of jerking yourself off
I'm not interested in conversing with people like you.
Goodbye.
Why are you surrounded by so many shitty people?
Consumerism.
I'm also in a capitalist hellscape, and I don't see this same issue with people I know.
Why is your subset different?
Probably because you're being willfully ignorant to avoid acknowledging how you and your peers are part of the problem.
I know what I'll put my money on.
Ahh, ok. So you don't know why things are wrong, but your happy to insult me. And I'm the problem.
https://lemmy.world/post/29615255
It's easier to fight with each other than it is to fight our puppet-masters.
How many recruiter screens are you getting? If you are getting a decent amount, your resume is likely good.
If you are failing recruiter screens, you are saying or doing something that is turning them off.
I would see if you can get feedback or have a friend “screen” you.
There are some services or organizations for mock interviews. Utilize them!
I lost my job in April 2024 and I finally got my new job at the end of January. Keep your chin up. Look for people you know who could give referrals. That's how I ended up getting hired. Good luck!
I do try.
Every single former co-worker has ghosted me at this point and even my friends have basically taken a "Hahaha, for sure mate, for sure, hey have you guys ever changed the conversation?" attitude when I bring up connecting me with people.
People suck lol.