this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2025
224 points (96.3% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

6659 readers
32 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Won't be long now.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 71 points 3 days ago (1 children)

As usual, we'll gauge the collapse by what the stock market is doing and ignore the millions of dead along the way.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

As the human population takes a steep decline, the market will also shrink. When people starve to death, they can’t work in your factories or buy your products. That can’t be good for quarterly revenue.

Won’t somebody please think of the profits!

[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 12 points 3 days ago

Labor-based production is such 20th century thinking. Modern companies don't try to make products, they try to acquire capital. Intellectual property, industrial capacity, housing, utilities access, etc. Cornering a market is so much more profitable than trying to compete in it.

Why do you think there's so much money going into AI? They can't wait to rid themselves of their human workforce so that humans starving to death won't affect their production targets.

If capitalists get their way, capitalism will outlive humanity. Inefficient humans and their annoying ecosystem dependency will be left to boil to death or something while Von Neumann probes owned by AI-managed corporations spread across the universe. Just imagine, one share in SpaceX would be worth several galaxies. You won't find a better ROI anywhere in the universe!

[–] Xaphanos@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

And mostly urban.