this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2025
168 points (97.2% liked)
Work Reform
12542 readers
207 users here now
A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.
Our Philosophies:
- All workers must be paid a living wage for their labor.
- Income inequality is the main cause of lower living standards.
- Workers must join together and fight back for what is rightfully theirs.
- We must not be divided and conquered. Workers gain the most when they focus on unifying issues.
Our Goals
- Higher wages for underpaid workers.
- Better worker representation, including but not limited to unions.
- Better and fewer working hours.
- Stimulating a massive wave of worker organizing in the United States and beyond.
- Organizing and supporting political causes and campaigns that put workers first.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'm pretty sure the cost of living numbers are for a household, not an individual.
So unless we're looking to get back to single income households, the min wage should be divided by two.
No, these are using the cost of living numbers for an individual. Cost of living for a family of four is over 2x higher by their same calculations.
So for two individuals making $35 an hour they would be close to affording comfortable cost of living in the cheapest state. Or it we were to make it equivalent to one individual’s income being enough for a family, they would need to be earning like 80 an hour
As I showed in my longer comment, this would make the modern minimum needed to afford average COL raising a family equivalent to a top tier income in 1958. Basically unless someone was a 1%er in 1958 they wouldnt be able to live comfortably today. That is how unsustainably far down our wages have stagnated. 47% of households make less than what it costs for one individual to live comfortably. The median income today might be at a roughly equivalent point when adjusting for inflation, but it is brutally low in comparison to what one can actually buy with what that same value of money bought someone in 1958
Well damn then.
That's extra depressing.