this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2025
677 points (98.6% liked)

Not The Onion

16782 readers
2187 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I prefer "stopped clock," since broken clocks can often continue ticking, albeit at the wrong speed.

[–] TheOakTree@lemm.ee 2 points 36 minutes ago (2 children)

A broken clock, whether it ticks too fast or too slow, is still right at least once every 24 hours, I think.

The only exception would be one that ticks correctly but is not set to the right time (does this count as broken?)

[–] Chip_Rat@lemmy.world 1 points 3 minutes ago

If it ticks faster than time than it would be right more than once (24hr time) a day, the faster it ticks the more times it will incidentally be correct (perhaps there is an allegory here..)

A clock that ticks slower than time would be right less than once a day, but it can never....

I feel like I need a simulator to understand this relationship actually....

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 1 points 9 minutes ago* (last edited 9 minutes ago)

If a 24-hr clock is one second slow per day, its correct once every 236 years.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 2 points 38 minutes ago

I mean with her she's right less than once a day.