this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2025
1242 points (99.1% liked)

Science Memes

15378 readers
2224 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheGiantKorean@lemmy.world 36 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

So this is pretty neat:

https://www.science.org/content/article/born-run-early-endurance-running--may-have-evolved-help-humans-chase-down-prey

Humans aren't good at running fast, but we are good at running for a long time for long distances, so it's thought that we would just run after things until they got tired.

So like you know how people in horror movies would run and then look over their shoulder and Jason is somehow still there?

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Funny enough there is another animal I know that can sweat, have more endurance than humans, and much faster than humans. Horses.

Imagine you fear getting caught by a horse or a human and then suddenly a human riding a horse shows up.

[–] sprite0@sh.itjust.works 26 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)
[–] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (4 children)

That's pretty cool. However, no human has ever won by more than 15min, and every horse has a 15min delay built into their times. So even the biggest winning margin of nearly 11 minutes would have lost to the horse if they had started at the same time.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The horses also all had humans on their backs. To my knowledge, none of the humans had horses on their backs.

[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

For it to be scientifically accurate of a comparison, the ratio of weight:human needs to be equal to that of rider:horse, not a direct flip.

In case my phrasing is confusing, to illustrate what I mean here is an example: a 200lb horse carrying a 100lb human is equivalent to a 100lb human carrying a 50lb weight.

[–] wischi@programming.dev 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Things don't scale linearly like that. Many things are proportional to either the surface (so x²) or volume (x³) or complex combinations of those.

[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 points 13 hours ago

Oh true true. I forgot about the square-cube law.

[–] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago

This study analyzes historical results of three different man versus horse races (in Wales, in Virginia, and in California). The data shows that human performance decreases with temperature, but less so than horses, so that 30°C is approximately where the best humans can start outperforming the best horses that year.

I would think that even with 15 minutes of intermittent pauses/checks, that time is still productive for cooling the animal and would add less than 15 minutes to the theoretical total if they were allowed to run the whole time.

[–] jboy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 days ago

The Western States trail in the California Sierras used to be where a 100-mile horse race took place that horse and rider had to complete in 24 hours. At some point in the 1970s one of the riders decided not to take a horse, and he finished in 23 hours on foot. Now it's an annual footrace that the winner finishes in about 14 hours.

[–] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Also in very short races (up to 100m) if the human is an olympic athlete, though mostly because momentum is a bitch and it takes time for the horse to accelerate all that mass, and by the time it's done the race is already over (it also probably helps that the athlete knows what they're doing while the horse is just along for the ride and wondering where it can get some grass).

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah it turns to foam especially under saddles

[–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 26 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (4 children)

Back in my reddit days I wrote a long comment about the fact that zombies are scary because they are the ultimate persistence hunters.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Zombies aren't scary. They're popular movie monsters because, while looking vaguely human, they're sufficiently "othered" that you can kill them without remorse (thus acting as a convenient stand-in for other groups that the audience wishes they could do that to) and because they represent an apocalypse that kills most of the people but leaves the stuff behind, meaning that you don't have to deal with society anymore but you'll still easily have a roof over your head and food on your table (albeit mostly canned food.)

[–] Taalnazi@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Huh, never thought about it that way. Great metaphor, tbh.

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

I mean, them being walking corpses might also have something to do with it...

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago

I remember reading that

[–] TheGiantKorean@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

That is scarier to me than the fast zombies.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 9 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It’s a consequence of bipedalism, less energy consumption to run but also slower

[–] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It's a few things that stem from bipedalism:

  • We can run and breathe entirely separately. Most quadrupeds lack the ability to run and take breaths independently of the pace of each step. Watching cheetahs sprint, for example, show that they have no choice but to exhale every time their legs come together and inhale every time their legs push apart.
  • Running on our hind legs only frees up our hands to be able to use tools and weapons, maybe even water containers for drinking on the go.
  • We can see further by standing up, and can make tactical decisions based on terrain, while still running pretty much full speed.

Combined with our unusual ability to cool ourselves by sweating, this gives us an advantage over pretty much any animal in the heat. Wolves and horses can still outrun humans in the cold, but lack the cooling mechanisms to maintain pace in the same heat that we can.

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

We also have by far the best throwing game in the world. Some animals can spit with reasonable accuracy, some apes can kind of lob shit in a general direction, and there's that one lizard that can spray blood from its eye, but nothing in the animal kingdom past or present has a human's innate ability for ranged attack. The average man can throw a fist sized rock hard and accurate enough to crack a skull from 20 yards with his bare hand. And we've spent the last 10,000 years inventing newer and more impressive ways of throwing stuff.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Humans domesticated dogs for their ability to hunt by scent. Dogs domesticated humans for their ability to throw a tennis ball.

[–] Bluewing@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

That and the easy free meals and wamr place to sleep for not much effort in return.

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Cats keep rodents under control so that our stored grain isn't destroyed or contaminated.

Mine doesn't. She just yells at me when she wants Fancy Feast.

[–] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 3 days ago

lizard that can spray blood from its eye, but nothing in the animal kingdom past or present has a human's innate ability for ranged attack

I don't know, a hawk plummeting from the sky at 190km/h onto something the size of a small rodent is kind of impressive, too, if you count the bird throwing itself as throwing...

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Running on our hind legs only frees up our hands to be able to use tools and weapons, maybe even water containers for drinking on the go.

And for wanking, although that may just be an adaptation to compensate for our inability to lick our own dicks.

[–] JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Yea but also tools

We don’t have to stop for water, we can bring some

Same for food

Our preys didn’t have such luck