this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)
Lisp
53 readers
3 users here now
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That's good to hear. It looks like that functionality was only added in 2 weeks ago, though.
It's possible I misinterpreted Alex Miller's response, but when I asked previously about how to support extra pom data (before
:pom-data
), that was the answer I was given: "We don't support lots of elements as we can sync from a source pom[. ]So write the pom template with whatever you need and sync that"I still sign all my packages. I mean, why not? I already have it all set up. It may be that I'm in the minority, but removing signatures would feel like a step backward.
I'm not sure why you consider this a "straw man / moot argument". Note that I'm not advocating people use Leiningen, I'm just stating the reasons I still use Leiningen.
You interpreted my response correctly at the time ... my mind was changed. :)
Nobody anywhere checks the signature (and if you try using the tools provided, you'll find out why), so signatures are largely security theater in maven world. This is bad, and we should do better. Hoping to eventually have time to work more on this, and have had some sidebars with Phil H about it.