this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2025
430 points (97.6% liked)

Programmer Humor

31948 readers
1447 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

How are class names relevant for accessibility?

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

They might mean class names can't help screen readers parse meaning, whereas using the correct tag can?

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

https://lemmy.zip/comment/19872383

Usability by third-parties. A webpage is not a pdf.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You think only aria-attributes are accessibility? Most accessible is, what you not need additional tools and interpreters for.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No, it's of course not just aria attributes. But it's definitely not "how easy can I create user CSS". Accessibility is a term of art, you can't just expand its meaning to whatever you want.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accessibility

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip -2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Look, if it hinders me in my workarounds for my ADHD while every other framework does less so, then accessibility is worse. Shut up with your trademark gatekeeping bullshit.

Also,