this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2025
821 points (99.5% liked)

News

31315 readers
3921 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Analysis of broadband affordability deemed "extraneous" by FCC chair.

The Federal Communications Commission is ditching Biden-era standards for measuring progress toward the goal of universal broadband deployment.

The changes will make it easier for the FCC to give the broadband industry a passing grade in an annual progress report. FCC Chairman Brendan Carr's proposal would give the industry a thumbs-up even if it falls short of 100 percent deployment, eliminate a long-term goal of gigabit broadband speeds, and abandon a new effort to track the affordability of broadband.

Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act requires the FCC to determine whether broadband is being deployed "on a reasonable and timely basis" to all Americans. If the answer is no, the US law says the FCC must "take immediate action to accelerate deployment of such capability by removing barriers to infrastructure investment and by promoting competition in the telecommunications market."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 57 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Why does everything have to be so fucking political?

Faster broadband is good. Who fucking cares what political party?

[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But corporations don’t want to spend money on customers, so they’d rather keep customers on slow speeds and charge the same price.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

so they’d rather keep customers on slow speeds and charge the same price.

Be fair. The prices go up.

[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

For rural communities to get higher speeds ISPs have to actually use the money the government gives them for increasing rural community internet speeds on increasing rural community internet speeds. If broadband is defined as "one house in the county has access to internet as fast as your grandparents had growing up" then they've already met their goal and they don't need to spend any money and collect pure profit from government subsidies.

Biden thought that was bullshit and established policy to direct them to do the right thing. The current administration, however, is more than happy taking their checks to the back.

[–] Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We should not be giving private entities cash without rigid metrics and timelines. In fact, we should claw back what we've given them.

[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 week ago

In general I'd agree. Unfortunately, private entities and lobbyists don't and they'll pay politicians for the privilege of getting free money at the expense of the rest of us.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Why does everything have to be so fucking political?

When will people who say shit like this wake the fuck up and realize that life is political?

Grow up and deal with it like everyone else, fucking cowards.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

and deal with it like everyone else

no, not like that, that doesn't do anything useful

[–] SheeEttin@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 week ago

Well yeah, we all know it's good. That's why Republicans want to take it away.

[–] btaf45@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Why does everything have to be so fucking political?

The problem with ignoring politics is that politics is never going to ignore you.

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago

The wedge is already in place. They just keep pounding on it. This is 100% what happens when corporations and governments become one.

[–] Decq@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

It's especially funny how Republicans are against regulations because according to them, it stifles progress and innovation. So why are they against regulations that try to force progress and innovation?

Of course we know why, because it's all a lie. They just want more money for the 1%. How there is even a single (non-1%'er) idiot left that votes for them is waaaay beyond me.