NBA - Main

14 readers

4 users here now

Game analysis, highlights and everything else that is happening in the NBA.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

communick@nba.space

Would you rather an 82 game season, or a 41 game season where all players are invincible? (alien.top)

submitted 1 year ago by BringBackFatMac@alien.top to c/nba@nba.space

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

After the disappointing news of Steven Adams season-ending knee surgery, it got me thinking about how we would see less injuries if the season were made shorter, and players had more time to recover and rest.

So in this extreme hypothetical example, would you rather see a usual 82 game season, or a 41 game season spread over the same 6 months, where players are physically incapable of being injured? Less basketball, but potentially more games played by injury-prone players who usually sit out a large chunk of the season.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] AdorableBackground83@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

As controversial as this may sound I believe that less is more.

Less games means every game has more ramifications added to it so load managing would not be a wise choice.

Plus the NBA product is at its best when it’s main characters are playing so I’ll chose the latter.