this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2025
927 points (97.8% liked)

News

36018 readers
3825 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Paywall removed: https://archive.is/aSaAL

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] supernicepojo@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago (13 children)

Is there another music streaming service around, so I can leave? I use it damn near everyday and the accessibility is what I crave.

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I switched to Tidal a couple years ago and I'm happy enough with it. It's cheaper than the comparable membership tier I was paying for with Spotify. The higher fidelity streaming is nice and supposedly it pays artists the most over any other steaming service. Their recommendation algorithm doesn't index so heavily on your favorite tracks like Spotify's does, so I'm discovering new music a lot more.

The UX isn't quite as smooth as Spotify's. I can't cast from the browser app and it doesn't remember what I'm listening to between devices. When I first switched there were a lot more bugs but I haven't noticed as many over the last year.

After Tidal inevitably succumbs to corporate rot, I'll be switching to owning my own collection and self-hosting. But until then, I'm happy with Tidal.

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Tidal is owned by Square (the mobile payment app/company), and I think Jack Dorsey (Twitter founder) owns that. So, probably safe to say it's already pretty corporate.

[–] username123@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 months ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago

Yes, but it's a million times better than Spotify, Google, and Apple.

[–] supernicepojo@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Isnt Tidal responsible for the problems of high quality music formats like .ogg? Making it hard to find and download from them.

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@piefed.world 15 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Have you tried Qobuz? It's french.

[–] jodanlime@midwest.social 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago

I jumped on Qobuz from a lemmy thread. Really happy with it. The artist selection is pretty broad and the Playlist are decent. But honestly, I haven't disliked anyone from the recommended home page which says a lot. I was on yt music before and it would always loop the same five artists no matter what radio station I started. It was really weird.

[–] supernicepojo@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Thank you for the rec. I will check it out, looks like theres even a mobile app.

[–] Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Honestly thata the issue I ran into. Napster and tidal were both in the running for a minute, both were more expensive, tidal is ran by Jay z and Napster is owned by a tech bro. Honestly, I'm more inclined to go back to cd.

[–] supernicepojo@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Its such a massive PitA to self-host things. Dont get me wrong I love the idea of it, it works in theory, and then you get an update for one of the multiple services you have to run to make it work ex-prem, or your isp does some funky stuff and drops out. There is such a massive time sink into self hosting that its not a reliable answer for 90% of people.

[–] jodanlime@midwest.social 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That's kinda the opposite of what I have found, once I get something to work it usually just works. Although I'm in IT so I'm pretty used to keeping 'in production' servers going. It absolutely is more work, because you aren't paying somebody else to do it, so you really need to decide if that's worth it to you. For many people the trade off in control and privacy aren't worth the extra work and paying somebody else to use their computers instead is far more convenient.

[–] supernicepojo@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Ive worked in IT before. If things ran as smoothly as you claim, I dont think you would have much of a job. I have had a pi-hole brick itself during an update, routers crash, home PCs just stop working.

You and I have the necessary skills to accomplish what needs to be done, just the basics of reverse proxy or ssh tunnels are damn near magic to most people. Hell, could you imagine walking your tech-illiterate neighbor through the process of it all and then expect them to keep it up without contacting you all time. I can not, which, is one of the reasons why I dont work IT anymore.

For real though, I believe that self-hosting is the only future for most of what are talking about here. I thought it was the most logical next step after everyone had libraries of music and movies at home in the 90s. I had assumed most people would want to keep those and would digitize.

The process to make that happen, and the hardware, are just not accessible to others outside our field. I would like to see a closer to all-in-one-solution become available. A system one could purchase with software ready to go all where you have to do is load it with content. Hell, call it a Spoopify Box or something equally ridiculous and you could VC angel funding in a week in SF.

[–] jodanlime@midwest.social 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Be the change you wish to see in the world, I guess. But I don't see a commercial product like that taking off, simply because the MPAA and RIAA will fight it. They will use the media to convince the public that it is a piracy tool. I also don't think it's fair to demand FOSS volunteers to cater to tech illiterates. These projects are a labor of love, not a product. Self hosting means you are taking the responsibility of hosting something, and that comes with pros and cons. I think expecting a black box solution to remain stable and secure in the long run is a hard sell for me, it doesn't line up with my personal and professional experience.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bent@feddit.dk 2 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I use a combination of Bandcamp, Qobuz and Jellyfin atm. It gives me the combination of using their apps or my own self hosted. The chances of everything going down at the same time is pretty slim I figured.

I also have all my purchased music stored in a Nextcloud instance so in a pinch I can play the local flac/mp3 files from my computer.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Vupware@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Yep, I’ve started buying all my media again, even music. Don’t want my copy of a movie to get censored, don’t want my music to get delisted.

The only exception is games. Damn you, steam, for being so awesome in every way except ownership.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Gonna cry when gaben kicks it, they go public, and become ea 2.0. Its gonna be hell for gamers.

[–] Vupware@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 months ago

All we can do is fight when the time comes. Hopefully his successor has the same values as him.

[–] Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm absolutely there on movies, even running my own jellyfin, but I listen to such a wide variety that I don't even know where to start getting some of them in physical.

[–] Vupware@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

You don’t necessarily need to buy physical to own. Most of my music comes from Bandcamp in the form of FLAC and mp3, but I have CDs and vinyl as well.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (4 children)

I use a Revanced YouTube Music app that doesn't play any ads, and it functions almost exactly like Spotify.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 5 points 6 months ago (15 children)

Do you have money? If so, buy music you like from the artists. Bandcamp is pretty good (though they sold out, and might enshittify).

I've been buying music for years and have a big library now

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 5 points 6 months ago

currently i'm doing bandcamp and tidal for my two most least evil options

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Tidal pays the highest per play amount to artists, and Apple Music also pays high (second highest for mainstream artists after tidal last I checked), and they have a massive library -but obviously they’re an evil megacorp so use your best judgement.

I personally use Apple Music but then I’m fully ensconced in the Apple ecosystem, so it works for me.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

How is Tidal evil? I've never heard anyone complain about anything but the old mqa standard they have since dropped.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] steal_your_face@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Apple music surprisingly. Good price, good bitrate, and aptx support on android.

[–] supernicepojo@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

I have become frustrated with Apple musics library management as the only Apple products I use are iPhones anyway

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I use YouTube music because I all ready pay for premium, but YouTube and Google are getting worse everyday though.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)