this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2025
1246 points (99.1% liked)

News

36292 readers
2855 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MrTrono@lemmy.world 30 points 6 months ago (3 children)

And awesome to see how effective it was, glad we got the regimen to rethink its policies... Oh wait they doubled down.

[–] tate@lemmy.sdf.org 70 points 6 months ago (2 children)

What are you trying to accomplish here?

Everyone else: next one is September 1st.
https://www.fiftyfifty.one/

[–] PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world 35 points 6 months ago

I think he’s correct in stating this administration won’t care if we protest or how large it is. What we hope happens is that the protests get more momentum amongst the politically inert. That momentum could build us up to a general strike which would have more influence once the capitalists bottom line gets impacted. Maybe. IDK. This all sucks.

[–] MrTrono@lemmy.world -2 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I've been to all the 50501 protests in my area as a show of support, but I'm not trying to accomplish anything. I'm just of the opinion that protests without action accomplish nothing. I am all into exercises, some real civil disobedience.

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 months ago

Our great grandparents armed themselves and took over the factory floors. We need some of that energy.

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 2 points 6 months ago

but I’m not trying to accomplish anything

This is the problem. Co-conspirators don't grow on trees, and protests are for networking because online chatter is too obvious. If you're going to protests, but not trying to accomplish anything by doing it, you're doing it wrong.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Mr Trump thanks you for your support.

[–] MrTrono@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Very welcome where do I collect my medal of freedom

[–] AmbitiousProcess@piefed.social 37 points 6 months ago (2 children)

That's why there needs to be a clear line that people know exists between performative protest and concrete protest.

For anyone confused:

Performative protests, like the No Kings protests, serve to:

  • Get people energized to either take concrete action or donate/join organizations that can
  • Reduce feelings of hopelessness/despair
  • Make people more aware who were previously not following the news much if all

Concrete protests actually delay or stop the bad thing in question (e.g. blocking exits to ICE facilities)

A lot of people are hoping No Kings and similar protests will stop Trump. They won't. Of course they won't. But you can bet there's a lot more people donating to charities that either legally fight the administration's actions, or disrupt fascist policies on the ground, and a lot of people end up breaking off from these more liberal protests to later go to more concrete ones.

They're not worthless, but nothing beats direct, concrete action.

https://beautifultrouble.org/toolbox/tool/dont-expect-a-concrete-outcome-from-a-symbolic-action

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

This is a very good way to explain it. We need both kinds, both are important.

[–] cecilkorik@piefed.ca 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So double down right back at them. What are you doing to stop what's happening? How else should we disrupt the regime's efforts? What do you recommend? Or do you think shitting on people's efforts is helpful somehow and will lead to a good outcome?

[–] Signtist@bookwyr.me 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

My mom was a huge speeder. She almost never went below 10 over the limit. Any time someone told her something along the lines of "The sign says 60, and you're going 80." she'd respond along the lines of "Well, good thing signs can't stop me then, huh?"

She'd always slow down if she thought she saw a cop, though.

I always think about that when people talk about protests as if they're the final step and not just the warning before a revolt. If you want self-centered people, like the ones running our government, to listen to your signs, you need them to fear what comes afterward if they don't.

[–] cecilkorik@piefed.ca 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Interesting analogy, and a great point. I think it's a lot like poker. They place their bets, we place our bets. They raise the stakes, we raise the stakes. Eventually one of us is either going to fold or we're both going to end up going all in, and then we'll finally end up seeing what our hands end up being once that happens. Are any of us prepared to fold on this? I'm not. Are they prepared to fold? I don't know. Are they bluffing or are they holding all the right cards? I don't know. If it comes to that, I guess we'll find out.

[–] Signtist@bookwyr.me 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That's a great analogy as well, though with the stakes as high as they are, I don't think either side is likely to fold. I think we'll have to show our hands and see who wins. I'd love to hear that the government caved in to our demands and everything is fine, but if that doesn't happen we need to understand that our work isn't done until we get what we need, regardless of whether or not they decide to give it to us willingly.

[–] cecilkorik@piefed.ca 1 points 6 months ago

I don't think their hand is really that strong, as much as they've been trying to convince people it is. Their media is powerful, the image they project is powerful. They have convinced us to fear of a massively powerful military-backed surveillance state, as we should, but is that really something they can achieve? Only with a lot more apathy and cowing to authority than they're actually going to get, I think. Americans (and even the military is made up of Americans) are an unruly bunch at the best of times, and the powers that be might think they have enough money and enough security in place to protect them as their popular support dwindles and the MAGA wave they rode to power begins to realize that these authoritarians are not giving them back "muh freedumbs" like they promised but are in fact taking more of them away. As the famous quote goes, "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." The regime has been ignoring and laughing at protests like 50501 and No Kings. They will have to fight eventually. Would the current regime survive more LA riots? Vietnam war protests? Another million man march? Probably. That's obviously what they're preparing for, as they should. But how far are they actually going to be able to go? And how far will the resistance go? I agree, we'll see once the cards are all on the table. But I think there's still plenty of room for hope that the actual future isn't going to be as bleak as it may seem right now.