this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2025
485 points (98.8% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

35412 readers
3964 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That doesn't seem weirdly detailed to me? Kid bumped their head and they wrote down what happened.

[–] iii@mander.xyz 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Look at the timestamps: 1:20 1:30 1:40 2:30 ridiculous.

Could just go: oh yeah he bumped his head today when parents come pick him up instead.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's an app. Do you actually think they're manually entering the time? The app is probably just rounding to the nearest 10 for display purposes. There's also a legal obligation to fill out an incident report.
You're caring for someone else's child and the law says if you felt the need to do something (ice pack) then the parents deserve documentation with timeline and response. Do you have a different criteria that's good for when a non-medical caregiver should need to tell a parent something happened to their kid?

[–] iii@mander.xyz 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

just rounding to the nearest 10 for display purposes.

I was referring to the amount of them. 3 in half an hour 😕 For no good reason.

the law says if you felt the need to do..

Luckily the law is different where I live. I'd rather have my child taken care of by a human, instead of a flowchart :)

Do you have a different criteria

When the caretaker feels like something important happened

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Oh, I assumed you thought people were spending a lot of time entering timestamps. Do you think this is a particularly onerous process for them, or that the parents need to like, acknowledge each log? They just push a button to select the kid and tap another to select the event. Maybe type a description if it's an incident report. It's significantly easier for them than logging it any other way, and it ensures parents get the information on food, diapers and whatnot.

I am confused how you see this as care by flowchart. Daycare staff aren't medical professionals. They aren't qualified to make objective decisions about what's an "important" event to notify parents of in a consistent manner. What country are you in where the parental notification laws are "I dunno, if you feel like it I guess"?

[–] iii@mander.xyz 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What country are you in where the parental notification laws are "I dunno, if you feel like it I guess"?

Belgium. There's no laws whatsoever that mandate notifications. They'll just tell you if something important happens

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well that seems quite odd. Most developed countries have standards for childcare settings, including defining minimums for activity and incident logging.
Finding regulations was difficult, but it seems that Belgium just has lower quality childcare than even the US, according to the UN. https://www.unicef.org/innocenti/reports/where-do-rich-countries-stand-childcare

Color me surprised. I kind of assumed if we had standards that anyone else would have similar or better standards.

[–] iii@mander.xyz 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

The only thing such laws do is make the care taker more of a replaceable robot, imo. In either case, you want someone that cares, and doesn't see a kid as a long to do list within an app.

No amount of laws can force someone to care. The reverse is often true, in my opinion. "Teach for the test" style.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, standards for care isn't "teaching for the test". You don't overfocus on "don't change diapers in the food prep area" or "tell the parents if you use the first aid kit" and somehow end up neglecting care.
I take my kids to a legal daycare. That means I know people who work there and are nearby have been certified in pediatric CPR and first aid within the past year. That they do fire drills. That they have a policy for when sick kids need to go home and when they can come back.

It's not about a law forcing people to care, it's about establishing a baseline. If a caregiver I haven't met swaps in for one I know I don't have to learn their standards on the spot.

It's odd to be opposed to standards.

[–] iii@mander.xyz 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

It's odd to be opposed to standards.

The baseline more than often becomes the goal, that's my issue. Oh so many people just go through the motions devoid of thinking and intent :) Now they also can go: I followed the flowchart what more do you want

Good news is it sounds like we both got exactly what we want!

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think the difference might be that you're thinking of standards that say "if you do A and B and C then you're a good ___". Happens with prescriptive education standards that are tied tightly with budget.
I'm thinking of standards like "failure to A or B or C, or doing X or Y or Z makes you an unacceptable ___". It's what you see in restaurants and hospital hygiene standards. Any restaurant "cleaning to the test" and only going down the food safety list and correcting any issue is both the type that would just be filthy without those standards, and also would end up serving safe food. Same for doctors and hand washing. We would rather all doctors be deeply committed to hygiene, but we have real world data that mandating hygiene minimums and doing things to enforce them has measurable increases in patient well-being. Same for building safety standards and such.

people just go through the motions devoid of thinking and intent :) Now they also can go: I followed the flowchart what more do you want

In a system with the standard, those people are providing better care than they would be without them.

[–] iii@mander.xyz 1 points 2 months ago

I've seen goodhart's law in effect too often. In practice the latter, "failure to A or B or C, .." always turns into the first, "just do A, B and C". Devoid of thinking why A, B and C need to happen. The same thinking that would lead people to also do E and F, and realize that sometimes A is not necessary.

I think we'll have to agree to disagree on this one ;)

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like a really good way to have half of these things forgotten throughout the day and never told to the parents 🤷‍♂️ logging this on the tablet takes literally 5 seconds, instead of having to spend 5 minutes with each parent at pickup

[–] iii@mander.xyz 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, I'd also rather talk with the person taking care of my child. So you can tell how they're doing, as this will reflect on your kid. I prefer those 5 minutes.

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 2 points 2 months ago

Sure, but those 5 minutes add up in a whole daycare.

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

You still ignored the first half.

Regardless, if they're logging, you can talk to them about the important parts without wasting several hours of important staff time every day between all of the parents. This isn't instead of talking to them, it's in addition.

This is also just super useful for all of the staff. Did Timmy just have a snack? No he doesn't need another. Did each staff member change Timmy's diaper today? We wouldn't have known it happened 5 times without the log, because that's not something you talk about every time.

[–] iii@mander.xyz -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

If it's important they'll remember. Talking to people, seeing how they're doing, isn't a waste of time in my opinion. Au contraire, it's rather important!

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If it's important they'll remember.

Absolutely fucking braindead take.

[–] iii@mander.xyz -1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Do you distrust the people who take care of your kid this much?

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Distrust? It helps to know if they napped or not, because that changes plans. Doctors ask about diaper change schedules. Bumps or scrapes are good to know about because not all effects are immediate.

It's not about trust. People forget shit, and comm lines get crossed when you're working with 4 other staff and 30 kids. Why rely on someone's memory when the alternative is faster, more consistent, and more informative?

People in general are faulty machines with shitty brains and worse memories. Add on that they're working in an extremely chaotic environment, usually overworked and understaffed. It would be literally fucking insane to expect them to remember everything that happened to every kid, and that's not even factoring in that each of the staff has completely different touchpoints throughout the day.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

Are you this unaware of how people actually function?
I wouldn't go so far as to call it braindead, because that just needlessly antagonistic, but we have a lot of evidence that people forget truly important things all the time, particularly in a setting where a group of people are working together to care for others.
Nurses and doctors will forget they administered medication and give double doses. People will forget that they needed to toss the spinach from the line because it's coming up to its safe lifetime and get people sick.
It's why we have checklists and logs where we write stuff down.
If my local coffeeshop has a checklist and log where they document cleaning the bathroom and doing a deep clean on the espresso maker, why on earth would it be unreasonable for the significantly more important job of "caring for babies" to also do so?