this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2025
663 points (98.8% liked)

News

36491 readers
2836 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Paywall removed: https://archive.is/KNzH9

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 12 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Late babyboomer and early genx are doing just fine for the most part. I mean they've spent the last 5 decades pillaging from their children and grandchildren's futures to keep the stock market booming.

If you put a $100 investment in the S&P 500 at the start of 1980, with dividends reinvested, it would have grown to approximately $17,427.60 by early 2025. This is the reason the vast majority of people who vote for Republicans are 55 and older, because they don't care about anything but securing their own bag.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If you put a $100 investment in the S&P 500 at the start of 1980, with dividends reinvested, it would have grown to approximately $17,427.60 by early 2025. 

WHICH CAN BUY YOU A HOUSE IN 1963.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I think the point is the 174x growth, not the final number based on the arbitrary $100. If you'd invested $10,000, you'd have $1,740,000 (simple extrapolation not accounting for dividend reinvesting, it's too early for math)

[–] theherk@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (3 children)

But a ton of these people got completely obliterated is 2008 too. My point isn’t there aren’t rich people, it’s that there are poor in each generation and the wealth gap is increasing across demographics, even if not uniformly.

[–] CatDogL0ver@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

There are poor people in each generation but post boomer generations are doing less well off compared to their parents.

I frankly don't see have how new technologies can help post boomer generations. It is just like the French revolution. Each generation is worse off than the one before. Eventually people will revolt.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You only got obliterated in 2008 if you took your money out of the machine.

With the S&P500 as an example, within 4 years it was back to where it was. By now, it's worth 4 times what it was in 2007 at the peak before the trough.

It's all about being able to save. If you can't then capitalism won't work for you. I feel it's worse now, but there's always been the poor and always will be. The world ain't about to get fair any time soon. They just rely on the welfare state a lot more. Which is fine. I suspect some of the people struggling the most just aren't claiming what they're entitled to.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

The people who were laid off didn’t have a choice.

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

But a ton of these people got completely obliterated is 2008 too.

And even more made more money than ever with the bounce back. The market recovered its losses within 4 years, but wages didn't recover until 2015-2016.

there are poor in each generation and the wealth gap is increasing across demographics, even if not uniformly.

For adults the poverty level is around 10% all age demographics, however the important thing to evaluate is the difference in wealth.

The median net worth under age 35 is about $39,000, but this rises to approximately $364,500 for the 55-64 age group.

[–] theherk@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

True, some people made that money back. But crucially, some didn’t. Partly due to market fears causing sales of positions and partly because they just had to retire in that window or because their annuity was invested poorly for those conditions. Some people did get wrecked and not always because they messed up.

But yeah, some people are doing well. More yet in the older age groups as you point out. I’m just saying the problem is more directly linked to class than generation. People need to increase class consciousness if the end is ever to be in view. A poor 50 year old is sinking in the same leaky boat as a poor 20 year old.

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 1 points 6 months ago

But yeah, some people are doing well. More yet in the older age groups as you point out. I’m just saying the problem is more directly linked to class than generation. People need to increase class consciousness if the end is ever to be in view. A poor 50 year old is sinking in the same leaky boat as a poor 20 year old.

I never claimed otherwise.... I'm just pointing out that there are clear overlaps when it comes to class and generational divides. I never claimed there weren't poor people above the age of 55, as I said earlier poverty levels for adults is around 10% across the board. The difference is that the vast majority of people above the age of 55 are in a different class than the rest of America.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 months ago

they don’t care about anything but securing their own bag.

You've just described humans in general.