this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

NFL

76 readers
3 users here now

A place for NFL news, game highlights and everything that excites you about American Football.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Let’s hear it! Give me your most unpopular opinions so far this season. I know this sub can be a hive mind echo chamber sometimes where people all arrive at certain assumptions and conclusions based on small sample sizes or bias’.

Here’s a few of my unpopular (to this sub) takes:

  1. RBs aren’t a “luxury” pick in the first round of the draft, you just have to accept that the pick won’t be as “long term” as other positions. Drafting guys like CMC, Travis ETN, Bijan, etc. aren’t “wastes” or “luxuries”. Those guys can really aid an offense, especially in the current era where we’re coming back around to ground attacks. The big issue is the second contract, but you’ll still have a stud weapon on the cheap for 4-5 years. More specially, I don’t see anything wrong with the Gibbs pick. People think he’s a bust or a waste bc he hasn’t been a 20-25 touch guy 6 games into his career… I think he can be a huge contributor for them for 4 seasons or so. If he helps them in big playoff games, then the pick is worth it, even if he’s not a guy who’s around for 6-10 seasons.

  2. A QBs ability to process info and remained poised is far more important than athletic ability. Everyone is looking for the shiny athlete like Josh Allen or Lamar, but honestly guys like Brock Purdy, Kirk, Goff, etc. are way more attainable and way safer. They can process info and deliver accurate passes. Obviously the gold standard is a freak athlete who’s an elite processor, but I think some teams try to find the athletes first then try to teach the mental aspect. While it’s true that you can’t teach athletic ability like Fields has, or the arm talent Wilson has, it’s not so easy to teach the mental component either.

What’re your guys’ hot takes and unpopular opinions?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LiquidDookie92@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You know how good a QB is after half a season of starts. More teams should do the Rosen/Murray approach and not care about sunk costs.

[–] kanbabrif1@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Shit then you might as well just cut every rookie qb who has a bad season. People don't fully grasp how difficult it is to be the qb, it can take someone years to figure it out at the pro level.

Not saying you should keep a qb who isn't performing for that long, but rarely the issue is as simple as are they good or not.

[–] GiggityDPT@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Half a season is ridiculous. Jags would have moved on from Lawrence. Bills would have moved on from Allen.

Half a season is 8.5 games. That's not nearly enough.