this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2025
694 points (99.7% liked)
196
4520 readers
3344 users here now
Community Rules
You must post before you leave
Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).
Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.
Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.
Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".
Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.
Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.
Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.
Avoid AI generated content.
Avoid misinformation.
Avoid incomprehensible posts.
No threats or personal attacks.
No spam.
Moderator Guidelines
Moderator Guidelines
- Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
- Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
- When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
- Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
- Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
- Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
- Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
- Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
- Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
- Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
- Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
- Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
- First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
- Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
- No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
- Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
- Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.
founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
At the risk of getting a lot of hate: I feel this is a bit misguided?
"Fiduciary responsibility" is, unfortunately, the law of the land and has been since long before the fascism took root.
The FCC Chairman is capable of doing massive, irreversible damage to a business like Disney/ABC without any means to prevent it (only punish it after the fact, and after a lot of time in court)
As a business, if the management at these companies perceives an undeniable threat to the financial interests of their company, they are literally required by law to mitigate that threat, and they cannot use "violating free speech" as a defense because the 1st amendment only applies to government actions (so they could sue the government for the FCC Chair's interference and still lose in court when their investors file a class action suit for breach of fiduciary responsibility).
This is an impossible situation for these companies and their management.
And yes, the very system itself is to blame here. But I, personally, cannot reasonably expect the leadership of Disney to risk retaliation from the FCC in order to "defend free speech" when doing so can cost them everything, not just professionally, but personally as well. And that's before we even start to discuss the downstream consequences for other people (like all the jobs lost if the FCC goes after Disney/ABC)
So, if you have reason to pirate content independent of this bullshit - which you do, fuck this capitalist shit hole and the companies that profit from and perpetuate it - then go right ahead. I ENCOURAGE it
But we ought to focus our vitriol on the fascists first.
NOTE: I am making a very subtle distinction here... Creating financial consequences for a business such that they are pushed to take action against government overreach is a valid form of resistance! We just need to be clear and honest about what we're doing. I don't hate or begrudge Disney leadership for what they did here. But I will absolutely use the tools at my disposal to resist the fascists, including exploiting the financial interests of corporations to create conflict between the fascists and businesses.
My hope is that the very first thing they did after cancelling Jimmy Kimmel Live! was start working on a first amendment suit against the government. And while we wouldn't know about that (it would be crazy for them to tip their hand early) I would not be at all surprised if that's exactly what is happening behind closed doors right now. I'm very sure that Disney leadership is absolutely bristling at the undue influence being brought to bear on them by the FCC chairman
This seems like a good reason not to support them financially if they comply with fascist demands.
Disney the corporation isn't the people running it because as you've pointed out there are systemic factors forcing their hands. For that reason it doesn't make sense to translate sympathy for what you might imagine they are feeling into sympathy for the company itself. Our relationship as consumers with these companies is inherently adversarial, and there's no need to anthropomorphize them, or take into consideration what would feel "fair" if a company could be thought of as a person, which it shouldn't.
As I said, there are plenty of good reasons not to support these companies financially. I am NOT arguing against withholding your patronage from these service providers. But it has little to do with their willingness to comply with fascist demands and everything to do with creating an environment where the business faces a greater existential threat from losing customers than they do from pushing back against the fascists. It's a subtle but important distinction, IMO.
Then the meme should use "that which" instead of "those who". I don't disagree with you but the meme is pretty clearly saying "the people in charge are supporting fascism" rather than "we can force change by hurting the business' bottom line".
I'm not clear on what the purpose or justification for it is. To me it sounds like what you're arguing is that these companies are not valid targets for moral condemnation, even if they might be valid targets for a strategic boycott. But why shouldn't they be? Why wouldn't this justify angrily calling for and acting towards their destruction, rather than attempting a strategic negotiation that is not overtly hostile? To me the former has two big advantages:
Because it's disingenuous and provides a clear avenue for counter-attack.
I don't want to get into an argument with everyone over the morality of these companies. That is a far less pressing concern than the fascists on our doorstep. And when your opposition is unscrupulous they will delight in any distraction from their faults.
I'm essentially performing triage. The infection doesn't matter if the heart has been destroyed. Stop the bleeding first, then handle the infection.
And if "fascists are wantonly disregarding the first amendment" isn't enough of a direct emotional reason for action then we've already lost 🤷♀️
My boy's wicked smaht
Lol a compliment AND Good Will Hunting quote? I'm here for it. Thanks
Honestly the real issue here from my point of view is Nexstar and Sinclair, who have the market and clout to force ABC to comply. But instead of calling for a boycott of the two companies putting on the pressure, everyone is concentrating on the company who's getting pressured and caving. It takes a long time to get a constitutional law case to SCOTUS, which ABC would clearly and easily win, but they would lose a $6.2 Billion dollar merger deal in the mean time. As much as people like to pretend that these companies work for us, they work for the shareholders. And stonks only go up or the CEO and the board have to find new jerbs.
I'm not defending what they're doing or that they caved at all, just providing an easily downvotable alternate point of view.
https://www.businessinsider.com/nexstar-deal-fcc-jimmy-kimmel-suspension-2025-9
Big time agreed. This is another major component of it and your assessment is spot on.