this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2025
72 points (85.3% liked)

Showerthoughts

37555 readers
1177 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Slotos@feddit.nl 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Any claim of universal system of morality existence shatters at the minutest contact with history.

The idea of morality is dominant and potentially universal across human societies. The actual definitions are invented and reinvented constantly and fairly rapidly.

[–] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Just because people have been wrong in their understanding of right and wrong many times and in many places does not mean objective, factual things cannot exist and be said about them. I'm sure that if we sat down the entirety of humanity to talk about it, we'd reach consensus about everything major and simple and concessions about anything minor and complex (and we'd understand the Ted Bundys of the world and their utterings in the similar fashion to our understandings of people born with major genetic defects... without the moral disgust, ofc).

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

By far, society is more moral than it's ever been. There have been ups and downs and some people are better than others, but if you look at all the atrocities that have been justified by the morality of the time, we've made a lot of progress as a whole.

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So why do you need an external creator to believe in them?

I don't think you do necessarily... if you're very clever, honest, empathetic and/or honourable, but it will certainly keep you more accountable and remorseful even in that case! And for the vast majority of people, who simply don't have any of those qualities to the necessary degree to competently move around in the world righteously, belief in God and fear of the Day of Judgment will be the main/only barrier to stop them from transgressing greatly. It would certainly help in this amoral, self-serving, anti-intellectual, post-truth USA, for example (and don't say these people believe in what Jesus believed in or anything like that, cause any cursory reading of the Sermon on the Mount could show you these so called religious people don't conduct themselves in any prosocial, selfless way, nor do the believe God will judge them for their atrocities/troublemaking).