Fuck Cars
A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!
Rules
1. Be Civil
You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.
2. No hate speech
Don't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.
3. Don't harass people
Don't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.
4. Stay on topic
This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.
5. No reposts
Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.
Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.
Posting Guidelines
In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:
- [meta] for discussions/suggestions about this community itself
- [article] for news articles
- [blog] for any blog-style content
- [video] for video resources
- [academic] for academic studies and sources
- [discussion] for text post questions, rants, and/or discussions
- [meme] for memes
- [image] for any non-meme images
- [misc] for anything that doesn’t fall cleanly into any of the other categories
Recommended communities:
view the rest of the comments
You will want to check your local laws on this one. Where I am the minimum speed limit is 20mph below the maximum unless otherwise posted (usually on highways where it will be posted 85/60 or something).
Sounds like you can drive slower.
I can. But your local laws may differ.
I see, I thought you were pointing out that some jurisdictions have minimums while others don’t. I also made the assumption that a minimum being the same as a maximum would never happen.
I’d be curious to learn of an area that says the minimum is the same as the maximum. Seems a bit… strange.
So you can slow down. This graphic was made because people always bicker about these things.
Off topic nitpick: If you use
>
for quotes instead of triple backticks, it wraps the text better (at least in firefox)vs
>
is typically for quotes, and the backticks for code, too.I did that intentionally, for dramatic effect. I wasn’t quoting anyone. Thanks for offering to help, though.
Italics would have been more standard.
formatting it as code means I now need to scroll sideways to read it. Maybe it's better on mobile or in whatever app you're using, but codeblocks don't auto-wrap when they reach the end of the line on my computer.
Interesting, your client is to blame for that. No scrolling in Voyager. Anything that does not soft wrap text in a context like this isn’t taking mobile seriously.
I don't think markdown wraps codeblocks by default, since code can be whitespace sensitive.
That’s why I said soft wrap.
Again, I'm on a computer. I'm using a desktop. Firefox is rendering the codeblock with a scrollbar on the bottom.
Edit: firefox on my android does the same thing. It puts a scrollbar on the bottom.