this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2025
608 points (96.1% liked)

Fuck Cars

13464 readers
253 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Its a good thing that busses and trains don't take you directly to your destination.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yes, because it's terrible to get somethwete in a timely manner, especially people unable to walk moderate distances.

[–] drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Its terrible because it is geometrically impossible for a form of transit to simultaneously have high capacity and to carry people directly to their destination.

Cars average an occupancy of about 1.5, while trains routinely carry hundreds of people. A bit of thought about the implications of everyone arriving directly at their destination should reveal why the average occupancy of such a transit mode can never be much higher than 1.5. This is something that many many advocates of PRT (personal rapid transit) systems fail to understand.

By the way, a pedestrian oriented space can be made to accommodate people that have difficulty walking, but it is virtually impossible to make a city safe and accessible for people with difficulty seeing if the expectation is that everyone is driving a car to their destination.

[–] Cevilia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago

Yes, but the point is: if people who can walk a short distance do walk a short distance, it frees up space for the people who cannot.