this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2025
480 points (98.4% liked)

Selfhosted

52145 readers
1017 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Homeplugs (ethernet over power) are fine for some things, but they add so much latency to the network.

Wired is so much better.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JustARaccoon@lemmy.world 96 points 4 days ago (5 children)

I mean does anyone go for power line adapters as their first choice when straight up ethernet is an option?

[–] purplemonkeymad@programming.dev 24 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The number of people that are anti wires, but also want WiFi signals everywhere is too high.

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 25 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Powerline is so leaky it is basically wireless with wires. 14x3 is not a transmission line, but it does effectively turn your whole home electrical system into both a transmitting and receiving antenna that just happens to talk to it's self. It's an engineering nightmare.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I use them to extend my network from my 3rd story apartment to my garage. Wireless doesn't reach, pulling a cable would be very difficult and expensive.

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Yeah there are use cases

[–] kadu@scribe.disroot.org 10 points 4 days ago (4 children)

I want wires everywhere I don't care fuck wireless signals give me wired headphones, controllers, networks

Me and my homies hate antennas

[–] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 hours ago

Got bad news for you buddy.

Wires ARE antennas.

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

i like the idea of wired headphones, but in practice they're kind of annoying

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 days ago

I imagine your home looking like the set of a Terry Gilliam film lol

[–] scott@lem.free.as 1 points 4 days ago

... and punctuation, apparently.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago

Powerline adapters are almost always a "last resort" option.

[–] SirActionSack@aussie.zone 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

In much of the world most houses will have existing electrical wiring but no network cabling.

[–] JustARaccoon@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sure, but then the question is "can you install network cabling?" If yes, then do that. Even without the interference bit, power line adapters are so finicky and unreliable that they shouldn't really be your go-to solution anyway

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think that the answer to "can you install network cabling" is mostly "no". That's why mesh networks are so popular these days.

[–] JustARaccoon@lemmy.world -4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah but between power line and ethernet, it's not a 1:1 comparison. If you can have ethernet you'll likely install ethernet. Power line fills a need for ethernet-like internet when you can't wire the place up.

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yes, we all know that. That's what we're telling you. Nobody is installing power line if running Ethernet is simple.

You seem to be expressing shock that people would choose powerline adapters as their first choice. People are replying to tell you that it's not their first choice, but they chose it anyway because running Ethernet is often way too difficult.

[–] JustARaccoon@lemmy.world -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Nobody is installing power line if running Ethernet is simple.

Not sure why you're adding any more, you're literally agreeing with my comment, but sure, act like my comment was about future replies, and not the op.

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Read the thread, and then ask yourself the question you just asked me.

[–] JustARaccoon@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It does.
But I mean you asked

I mean does anyone go for power line adapters as their first choice when straight up ethernet is an option?

And when someone "no, because..." and you keep replying with inane responses that sound like arguments but don't actually say anything.

A recreation of the thread:
OP: power line adapters gave me network problems
A: nobody prefers power adapters
B: right, but it's still the best option for some
A: people would prefer Ethernet
B: yes, but that's not feasible for some
A: why are you replying if you agree?
B: ask yourself that. Do we agree or not?

[–] mhzawadi@lemmy.horwood.cloud 4 points 4 days ago

I would not, but we had a working system so moving things about should have been fine. I think running over 2 consumer units adds to the latency

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 2 points 4 days ago

Me, i'm still sorting the basement before i run RJ through it