Ah yes, the franchise beloved for its extreme violence and awesome practical effects is doing something without extreme violence or practical effects.

Bold strategy Cotton.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Exec boardroom

We must expand the tech of this film full of murder, carnage, and brutality against humans.

What if we removed those 3 aspects? Then we can lower the age rating to envelope a wider audience.

Wouldn't that alienate the existing fanbase?

Well, think about the new fans we will make.

[–] xyguy@startrek.website 2 points 5 days ago

Yes, because theres nothing teens like more than a long dormant (until recently) 80s action movie franchise.

The other thing young people famously like is paying to go to movie theaters.

I hope I'm wrong. Prey was pretty cool, but I dont see myself going out of my way ro see it and I would consider myself a pretty big Predator fan.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Is it? Or is the ratings board just being lax so that the studio can bring in cash from teenagers?

[–] xyguy@startrek.website 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I mean its possible. I wonder if they will get to use their 1 legally allowed F word, and who will say it.

[–] nixon@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

My bet is on a Predator saying it because that is meta and edgy; it hits all demographic targets.

[–] xyguy@startrek.website 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The Predator will call a human "one ugly motherfucker". God of course. Meta, edgy, flipping the script just to be different without justifying it in the story. Hollywood perfection.

[–] nixon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago

Yep, it’s a Hollywood layup, they’d be made fun of within their fart-sniffing sphere of influence if they didn’t do it.

[–] nixon@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 days ago

Also too, no human characters are apparently hurt in it, only synths, Predators and other monsters killing each other.

Violence against humans requires a more restrictive rating and because the movies lacks human deaths the violence can still be the same but at a PG-13 rating.

[–] Steve 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I welcome seeing something new in a largely one dimensional franchise.

I haven't cared about MPAA ratings since I turned 18.

[–] xyguy@startrek.website 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

The only time I look at ratings are for horror movies. A PG13 horror movie is usually not something worth my time. There are exceptions to every rule bit still.

Usually I want something to move up to PG13 rather than down from R.

[–] Steve 1 points 5 days ago

Is this supposed to be a horror movie?
I saw nothing in the trailer that seemed like a horror movie.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 days ago

It's a romance between a predator and a human this time.

[–] Ilandar@lemmy.today 1 points 5 days ago

“We'll see where it ends up, but our hope for it is that it can be a PG-13 that feels like an R,” Rosenblatt said. “That's kind of our hope. And really, what that's about is just being able to broaden out the audience for a movie like this.”

“We don't have any humans in the movie and so we don't have any human red blood,” Rosenblatt continued. “So we're hoping that's gonna play to our advantage. We're going to go as hard as we possibly can within those constraints, and we think we'll be able to do some pretty awesomely gruesome stuff. But in colours other than red.”